Re: Proposal for two new objects
"Mark S. Lewis" <mlewis@telebit.com> Tue, 22 February 1994 19:17 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10397; 22 Feb 94 14:17 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10392; 22 Feb 94 14:17 EST
Received: from apache.telebit.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13587; 22 Feb 94 14:17 EST
Received: from america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.CO (america-bb.sunnyvale.telebit.com) by apache.telebit.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Telebit-Apache-Brent-940210) id AA00796 to ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us; Tue, 22 Feb 94 11:11:18 PST
Received: from yoyo.telebit.com by america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM (4.0/america.telebit.com-DBC-930718) id AA02370 to modemmgt@apache.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM; Tue, 22 Feb 94 11:11:15 PST
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 11:11:15 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Mark S. Lewis" <mlewis@telebit.com>
Message-Id: <9402221911.AA02370@america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM>
Received: by yoyo.telebit.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA12599; Tue, 22 Feb 94 11:11:14 PST
To: aclark@hayes.com
Cc: modemmgt@telebit.com
In-Reply-To: <0097A6223408CD40.20AF990B@hayes.com> (aclark@hayes.com)
Subject: Re: Proposal for two new objects
Reply-To: Mark.S.Lewis@telebit.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Feb 94 09:12:11 EDT, aclark@hayes.com said: > There are a large number of modems in the field and many more will ship > before we have an agreed modem management standard (whatever it's based > on). In general terms you can expect modem vendors to be able to > upgrade their management system software fairly easily, to upgrade their > existing rack control software with more difficulty and to upgrade the > modem functionality more slowly (and the installed base of product > is probably not upgradeable). > As a general guide I believe that we should ensure that any MIB objects > should be capable of being supported via a proxy agent .. largely > because this is the mechanism that most vendors will use to map > the emerging management requirements onto the capabilities of their > existing products. Although many vendors are developing new rack systems > that are SNMP capable and soft our industry has much more of an installed > base problem in that there are many existing networks installed and the > trend in the past was to provided ROM'd rather than downloadable > firmware. > This implies that we should ensure that the MIB does not require any > functions that are not in .. widespread use as AT command addressable > functions .. V.58 (as many vendors have used this as a basis for their > enterprise MIBs). > Alan Clark > Hayes Microcomputer Products Agreed. I guess you are agreeing with me that it would be hard for modem vendors to support the mdmCCInitialLine*Rate objects. ... Mark ==========-------------- Mark S. Lewis ----------========== Mark.S.Lewis@Telebit.com Telebit Corp. Voice (408) 745-3232 mdmCCInitialLineTransmitRate OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The initial link transmit rate of the current connection, or the initial link transmit rate of the last connection in bits per second." ::= { mdmCallControlEntry 9 } mdmCCInitialLineReceiveRate OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The initial link receive rate of the current connection, or the initial link receive rate of the last connection in bits per second." ::= { mdmCallControlEntry 10 }
- Proposal for two new objects Steven Waldbusser
- Re: Proposal for two new objects Mark S. Lewis
- Re: Proposal for two new objects Mark S. Lewis
- Re: Proposal for two new objects Steven Waldbusser
- Re: Proposal for two new objects Mark S. Lewis