RE: any implementations?
"Clark, Alan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Thu, 24 April 1997 15:23 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa26964; 24 Apr 97 11:23 EDT
Received: from [184.108.40.206] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13059; 24 Apr 97 11:23 EDT
Received: from Chelmsford.Telebit.COM (sharps.chelmsford.telebit.com) by webster.telebit.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Telebit.COM-Sendmail-V4.3) id AA07184 to email@example.com; Thu, 24 Apr 97 11:09:08 EDT
Received: from webster.telebit.com by Chelmsford.Telebit.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1-pmm-2) id AA00864; Thu, 24 Apr 97 11:09:07 EDT
Received: from atl_xch_srvr1.hayes.com by webster.telebit.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Telebit.COM-Sendmail-V4.3) id AA07181 to modemmgt@Telebit.COM; Thu, 24 Apr 97 11:09:03 EDT
Received: by atl_xch_srvr1.hayes.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63) id <01BC509F.CF70F580@atl_xch_srvr1.hayes.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 11:08:16 -0400
From: "Clark, Alan" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "'modemmgt@Telebit.COM'" <email@example.com>, 'Jim Barnes' <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: any implementations?
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 11:08:16 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The IETF modem management MIB was not widely supported by the community of modem manufacturers. A second modem MIB was developed within the ANSI TIA TR30 committee, I believe this was approved and released in 1995 with the status of a US standard. TR30 is attended by almost all of the US modem manfacturers and hence is generally a better place to develop modem standards. The TIA MIB was developed to map closely onto the ITU V.58 modem management standard, as was the new V.25ter extended AT command set. This means that the same basic semantics may be used for control of a modem regardless of whether SNMP, CMIP or AT commands are used. There are several obvious advantages stemming from this:- (i) The behaviour of the modem is not required to be different for SNMP vs other protocols (ii) It is easy to translate SNMP or CMIP commands to AT+ format to interface to modems that don't have embedded agents I also have a draft DMTF MIF based on the same V.58 standard and could complete and distribute this if there is any interest. Alan Clark email@example.com (preferred) firstname.lastname@example.org >---------- >From: Jim Barnes[SMTP:email@example.com] >Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 1997 2:44 PM >To: modemmgt@Telebit.COM >Subject: any implementations? > >Has anyone implemented RFC 1696 or know of any fielded implementations, >either agent or management application? > > Jim Barnes (firstname.lastname@example.org) >