Procedural Question

Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com> Tue, 02 May 1995 21:48 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11283; 2 May 95 17:48 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11279; 2 May 95 17:48 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17193; 2 May 95 17:48 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11272; 2 May 95 17:48 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11268; 2 May 95 17:48 EDT
Received: from wd40.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17169; 2 May 95 17:48 EDT
Received: from ftp.com by ftp.com ; Tue, 2 May 1995 17:48:52 -0400
Received: from mailserv-D.ftp.com by ftp.com ; Tue, 2 May 1995 17:48:52 -0400
Received: from kasten.europa by mailserv-D.ftp.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA00447; Tue, 2 May 95 17:46:27 EDT
Date: Tue, 02 May 1995 17:46:27 -0400
Message-Id: <9505022146.AA00447@mailserv-D.ftp.com>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Procedural Question
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com>
Reply-To: kasten@ftp.com
X-Orig-Sender: kasten@mailserv-d.ftp.com
Repository: mailserv-D.ftp.com, [message accepted at Tue May 2 17:46:24 1995]
Originating-Client: europa
Content-Length: 495

Hi

I've read through Ran Atkinson's documents that he submitted (or so I
am under the impression...) and Phil Rogaway's objections and have a fairly
large set of comments. What do I do with the comments? Send them directly
to Ran or to Jeff Schiller (or someone else) for ....?

thanks
--
Frank Kastenholz    "The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy
                     present... As our case is new, so we must think anew, and
                     act anew" - A. Lincoln