IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Modern] Nationwide Number Portability MODERN Use Case Draft

Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Tue, 01 March 2016 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A491B2D5D for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:32:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiRTEol1VRKO for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:32:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.16.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C92BA1B2D5C for <modern@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:32:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 10067 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2016 15:31:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by qproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2016 15:31:59 -0000
Received: from box462.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.62]) by cmgw3 with id QmBr1s00n1MNPNq01mBu1o; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:11:57 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=GOWbTI9K c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:117 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=8WrITzYgnNwA:10 a=p-_XEfp0GhYA:10 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=JL-7mqT1AAAA:8 a=k_tLPb9Yinwr6tOsR6wA:9 a=U-kp378RjyacFrRN:21 a=b-WwJ3rG_DS4o8Vj:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=-FEs8UIgK8oA:10 a=NWVoK91CQyQA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:To:From:Subject:Date; bh=6yoF8CBPqavYxlQ7XfUFLnV8omSHHkqSEQDx3XRJEGE=; b=d24G3uSFf4sL1rB9SeLRPEJCsDMfu6IAVVAVpbzOhrMzywEoFlSp7ckzLcus73i7RDI8+yI3pOIvTvYy8E++GJuTZFHAhwIUherKS5CP+J9l6MeiSNhr6k+qR2hV7BdF;
Received: from [100.36.35.60] (port=49978 helo=[192.168.1.9]) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1aalxq-00022q-54; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:11:54 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160212
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:11:46 -0500
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch>, 'Henning Schulzrinne' <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>, 'Paul Kyzivat' <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, 'Modern List' <modern@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D55AB998-2C24-4D2D-A1C0-586A9A017FAD@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [Modern] Nationwide Number Portability MODERN Use Case Draft
References: <00cd01d16fdb$1a128f80$4e37ae80$@ch> <D2F48044.3507D%tom.mcgarry@neustar.biz> <68346e41454447f1b75d61da4c51821b@PLSWE13M08.ad.sprint.com> <3af9e40382f34867bd866707fc4b1ce9@PLSWE13M01.ad.sprint.com> <D2F473C5.17AE33%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <0dd72becae6d4d9b8ea4bccc4d9f9602@PLSWE13M08.ad.sprint.com> <56CF87AE.6070801@alum.mit.edu> <BCA7B7B9-25D2-4407-927D-2096957334BD@shockey.us> <CY1PR09MB063465E5E4F1606120CD8295EABA0@CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <4EE72534-1CF1-46B1-82DB-7BE9DA260543@shockey.us> <005201d17393$3a8dbfd0$afa93f70$@ch>
In-Reply-To: <005201d17393$3a8dbfd0$afa93f70$@ch>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 100.36.35.60 authed with richard+shockey.us}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/modern/R-Qr_LcfoUozkHVpToXVz6UZ9Io>
Subject: Re: [Modern] Nationwide Number Portability MODERN Use Case Draft
X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" <modern.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/modern/>
List-Post: <mailto:modern@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:32:04 -0000

Richard, I will grant one thing Henning mentions.  

A lot of the problems look US centric because the problems have started here first.  I can’t recall if the US was the first country to deploy LNP but it was certainly the largest at the time. I do know the cost factors we encountered in the US scared the daylights out of European NRA's.  Its obviously much easier now.  I could run the NPAC on my iPhone rather efficiently.

IP interconnection for voice in the US is without question much more advanced and further along than anything I’ve looked at in the EU or Asia-Pac. My guess is nearly 40% now and with the VoLTE roll outs it will be about 80% and then the real whining about the PSTN Transition endgame begins. By all accounts Canada is about 24 months behind us but the Cable Operators have begun the process with Bell and the others moving along rather quickly. They are having the same problems with all that lovely ..(cough) Nortel gear. 









On 3/1/16, 3:20 AM, "Modern on behalf of Richard Hill" <modern-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote:

>Inline.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Modern [mailto:modern-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard
>> Shockey
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 00:33
>> To: Henning Schulzrinne; Paul Kyzivat; 'Modern List'
>> Subject: Re: [Modern] Nationwide Number Portability MODERN Use Case
>> Draft
>> 
>
>SNIP
>
>> 
>>I still have
>> problems undertaking work where the actual user community has not
>> weighed in on requirements. I’d feel a lot better if there was some
>> input from BEREC for instance.
>> 
>> http://berec.europa.eu/
>
>As I said before, if the intent is to develop something that is not targeted only at the USA, then it would be worth trying to broaden the source of inputs.  Consulting BEREC would indeed make sense, but I would enlarge to include the GSMA and ITU-T Study Group 2.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Modern mailing list
>Modern@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email