IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Modern] End of WGLC on draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-02

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64FF1275AB for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0H85qekhX9E1 for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81ADC126B72 for <modern@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-8097.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8097.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.128.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v6I611KI045192 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <modern@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:01:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
To: modern@ietf.org
References: <d7d2a38d-965e-e908-fd0c-862a5f339ff2@usdonovans.com> <D5828B13.1E1D4F%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <BY2PR06MB1800530A5BD8217ABADAF5AFC6A10@BY2PR06MB1800.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <cbbd1d7c-03ac-7cda-46e1-fd18ca2f49ed@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:00:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR06MB1800530A5BD8217ABADAF5AFC6A10@BY2PR06MB1800.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/modern/g5v6jodBr3H2C5cc1Izwg6v9iP0>
Subject: Re: [Modern] End of WGLC on draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-02
X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" <modern.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/modern/>
List-Post: <mailto:modern@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:01:05 -0000

Natalie -

WGLC is just one step for a document on its way to publication. It is a 
tool the chairs use to determine that there is consensus in the working 
group to ask the IESG to review the document for publication.

There will be more reviews and opportunity to comment going forward, the 
most visible being an IETF-wide Last call (IETF LC).

Comments are welcome at any time. Early comments are better than late 
comments.

RjS


On 7/18/17 6:40 AM, McNamer, Natalie wrote:
> I apologize, I am still trying to gain an understanding of the process flows of the IETF -
>
> Please clarify what this means?  I had thought comments needed to be made within the Last Call timeframe?
>
> Below, Steve states as a co-chair of the group that the WGLC  completed without comment.  I assumed that meant it was final - now am I correct that it is "reopened"?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks
> Natalie McNamer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Modern [mailto:modern-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peterson, Jon
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 6:58 AM
> To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>; modern@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Modern] End of WGLC on draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-02
>
>
> We did in fact get some private comments, and based on those I made a few changes to the document for this version. Given all the interest in credentials in STIR and ACME, it made sense to introduce a "credential authority" role in the MODERN framework. One could say that the MODERN framework now gives an overall picture of how we imagine a lot of the components surrounding STIR could come together - which might not be a bad destiny for the MODERN work.
>
> Jon Peterson
> Neustar, Inc.
>
> On 6/28/17, 10:13 AM, "Modern on behalf of Steve Donovan"
> <modern-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of srdonovan@usdonovans.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> The two week WGLC has completed without comment.  We will talk about
>> next steps for the draft during the MODERN session in Prague.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Modern mailing list
>> Modern@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern
> _______________________________________________
> Modern mailing list
> Modern@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern
>
> _______________________________________________
> Modern mailing list
> Modern@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email