[Modern] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-03: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2018 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: modern@ietf.org
Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175DE1270FC; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:59:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework@ietf.org, modern-chairs@ietf.org, srdonovan@usdonovans.com, modern@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.72.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151880034804.1429.7842564021239285493.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:59:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/modern/jOh7b-b_uqHrD6Vtsv9CPgTahRo>
Subject: [Modern] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" <modern.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/modern/>
List-Post: <mailto:modern@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:59:08 -0000
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (0) For the benefit of non-modern readers, changing the title or at least making it clear that "modern" refers to an acronym, and later expanding and explaining would be very nice. (1) The document mentions the need for authentication, integrity and confidentiality when retrieving information. However, I didn't see anything related to verifying that in fact the CSP (for example) is the "proper authority" -- IOW, how can the user requesting information verify that the CSP is in fact the one responsible for the TN? I'm thinking of the case where the CSP was assigned a TN from the numbering authority (how is that verified?), and also the portability case (4.2.3.1) where the "old CSP" is no longer responsible for the user's service. Given that this document is a framework, I obviously don't expect a solution. But I think validation of the assignment chain should be included for consideration by future solutions.
- [Modern] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ie… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Modern] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draf… Peterson, Jon