IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Modern] Nationwide Number Portability MODERN Use Case Draft

"Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch> Tue, 01 March 2016 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rhill@hill-a.ch>
X-Original-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F98F1B354C for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:20:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Zgq6TuNMhO2 for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:20:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8B11B354A for <modern@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:20:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.infomaniak.ch (smtp4.infomaniak.ch [84.16.68.92]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u218KYsF022887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:20:35 +0100
Received: from RHillNew (adsl-178-39-181-33.adslplus.ch [178.39.181.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp4.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u218KXn8023152; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:20:34 +0100
From: "Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch>
To: "'Richard Shockey'" <richard@shockey.us>, "'Henning Schulzrinne'" <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>, "'Paul Kyzivat'" <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "'Modern List'" <modern@ietf.org>
References: <00cd01d16fdb$1a128f80$4e37ae80$@ch> <D2F48044.3507D%tom.mcgarry@neustar.biz> <68346e41454447f1b75d61da4c51821b@PLSWE13M08.ad.sprint.com> <3af9e40382f34867bd866707fc4b1ce9@PLSWE13M01.ad.sprint.com> <D2F473C5.17AE33%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <0dd72becae6d4d9b8ea4bccc4d9f9602@PLSWE13M08.ad.sprint.com> <56CF87AE.6070801@alum.mit.edu> <BCA7B7B9-25D2-4407-927D-2096957334BD@shockey.us> <CY1PR09MB063465E5E4F1606120CD8295EABA0@CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <4EE72534-1CF1-46B1-82DB-7BE9DA260543@shockey.us>
In-Reply-To: <4EE72534-1CF1-46B1-82DB-7BE9DA260543@shockey.us>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:20:33 +0100
Message-ID: <005201d17393$3a8dbfd0$afa93f70$@ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdFzTF3ehleg5/dlSOGbDbbU+PuKawARmu+w
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/modern/taHsUVcezfeCzbydOXkBS6b6mx8>
Subject: Re: [Modern] Nationwide Number Portability MODERN Use Case Draft
X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" <modern.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/modern/>
List-Post: <mailto:modern@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:20:46 -0000

Inline.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Modern [mailto:modern-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard
> Shockey
> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 00:33
> To: Henning Schulzrinne; Paul Kyzivat; 'Modern List'
> Subject: Re: [Modern] Nationwide Number Portability MODERN Use Case
> Draft
> 

SNIP

> 
>I still have
> problems undertaking work where the actual user community has not
> weighed in on requirements. I’d feel a lot better if there was some
> input from BEREC for instance.
> 
> http://berec.europa.eu/

As I said before, if the intent is to develop something that is not targeted only at the USA, then it would be worth trying to broaden the source of inputs.  Consulting BEREC would indeed make sense, but I would enlarge to include the GSMA and ITU-T Study Group 2.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email