[MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU // Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt
Yungui Wang <w52006@huawei.com> Thu, 11 December 2008 02:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: monami6-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-monami6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC89F3A69C7;
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:19:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2025E3A691C
for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:19:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.915
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.409,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id VmpNFZQYQ9IM for <mext@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AFC3A687F
for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9])
by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KBO00K43X40KB@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for
mext@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:19:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.33])
by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KBO0020TX40NS@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for
mext@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:19:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from w52006a ([10.164.12.21])
by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KBO00AAJX3Z81@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for
mext@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:19:12 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:19:10 +0800
From: Yungui Wang <w52006@huawei.com>
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, mext <mext@ietf.org>,
Julien Laganier <julien.laganier.ietf@googlemail.com>,
Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Message-id: <02d201c95b36$dacf4c70$150ca40a@china.huawei.com>
Organization: Huawei Technologies
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <491039B9.6090400@it.uc3m.es>
Subject: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU // Re: WGLC for
draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1217967101=="
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Hello Here is one comment about using MR-HA tunnel for DHCP-PD. In this draft, the MR registration processing needs 3 round trip between MR and HA. i. BU to HA; (getting and binding MR_HoA) ii. DHCPv6 message over MR-HA tunnel. (getting MNP) iii. BU to HA; (binding MNP) While, if PD is combined within BU, it is only 1 round trip. >From implementation of viewpoint, the later seems well done prior of the former. Maybe I have lost something, can anyone tell me the story why we gave up the latter in the new version? Thanks. B.R. Yungui ----- Original Message ----- From: marcelo bagnulo braun To: mext ; Julien Laganier ; Ralph Droms Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:02 PM Subject: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Hi, We now start the WGLC for: DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Please send comments about the draft till the November 19. Regards, Julien and marcelo _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
_______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
- [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Basavaraj Patil
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Ralph Droms
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Basavaraj Patil
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Giaretta, Gerardo
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] 'serialized' DHCP Relays (was: WGLC fo… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Romain KUNTZ
- Re: [MEXT] WGLC for draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-01.txt Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU // Re:… Yungui Wang
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… fan zhao
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Yungui Wang
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… fan zhao
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Yungui Wang
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Romain KUNTZ
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Romain KUNTZ
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Romain KUNTZ
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] DHCPv6-PD for NEMOv6 MR (was: using MR… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] using MR-HA tunnel vs. combining BU //… Ryuji Wakikawa