[MEXT] Missing fields in BCE and BULE - DSMIPv6-07
"Desire Oulai" <desire.oulai@ericsson.com> Mon, 05 January 2009 20:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: monami6-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-monami6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9933A6A25;
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:59:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0E33A6A25
for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:59:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.282
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.282 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.316,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id qRhuOxgBxQ8K for <mext@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr2.ericy.com (imr2.ericy.com [198.24.6.3])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239153A6A22
for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:59:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se
[138.85.77.51])
by imr2.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n05KwxZZ026523;
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:59:01 -0600
Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by
eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:58:59 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:58:56 -0500
Message-ID: <D373F8710ACBA6419BF0B7A5177691CC059CCA6A@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Missing fields in BCE and BULE - DSMIPv6-07
Thread-Index: AclhTfzKP7yghB2oSfa4cZ2d39mpbgOKhK5g
From: "Desire Oulai" <desire.oulai@ericsson.com>
To: "Hesham Soliman" <hesham@elevatemobile.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2009 20:58:59.0361 (UTC)
FILETIME=[6E460110:01C96F78]
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: [MEXT] Missing fields in BCE and BULE - DSMIPv6-07
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1568055343=="
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org
> Hi Hesham, > > In DSMIPv6, flags in BU/BA messages and NAT detection option have > been defined to require UDP encapsulation. Also a T flag for TLV is > defined. As UDP encapsulation and TLV usage may differ from a MN to > another, we need some new fields in the BCEs and BULEs. The missing > fields are: > - A 1 bit UDP field to indicate that UDP encapsulation is required > - A UDP port number > - A TLV type field (when it is all zero, no TLV required) > > BR > > Desire
_______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
- [MEXT] Missing fields in BCE and BULE - DSMIPv6-07 Desire Oulai