IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MEXT] Comments on draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-01.txt

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Mon, 15 December 2008 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: monami6-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-monami6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357C928C12F; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:10:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E563A67F7 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:10:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfUA5aMhuPLP for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B7C3A6804 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF1EB475A9; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:04:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: mext <mext@ietf.org>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:04:16 +0100
Message-Id: <1229364256.18243.44.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1
Cc: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-01@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [MEXT] Comments on draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1758826813=="
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org

Dear authors,

	I've read the draft and I find it quite useful, thanks!

	I've have some minor comments to add to which have been already said on
the ML:

	- About sections 3.1 and 3.2: To me, all 3.2.x sections seems pretty
much the same than 3.1.x. IMHO, it'd be better to just point out the
differences or describe only an abstract architecture and the describe
the minor particularities of each.
	- About Req. 6: To me this is completely solution space and it
shouldn't be a requirement. Besides, it makes C2C-CC and CALM differ in
terms of NEMO RO requirements, which is not very nice, IMHO, for this
kind of document (standard wide).

	Thanks!

	Carlos

-- 
 Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
 GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  WEEDEV 2009: 2nd Workshop on Experimental Evaluation and
        Deployment Experiences on Vehicular networks
                  http://www.weedev.org/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email