Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration after Separate Binding Registration in MCoA

Hi Desire,

I can add some texts in the Security Consideration Section.

ryuji

On 2008/12/18, at 18:46, Desire Oulai wrote:

> Hi Benjamin,
>
> If initial bindings are done by separate registration, we can assume
> that CoA verification is done as each BU as the corresponding CoA as
> source address. Therefore, the MN can perform bulk re-registration or
> deregistration. Ruyji, should we have some text related to this in the
> draft?
>
> BR
>
> Desire
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benjamin Lim [mailto:benjamin.limck@sg.panasonic.com]
>> Sent: December 18, 2008 1:52 AM
>> To: Ryuji Wakikawa
>> Cc: Desire Oulai; mext@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration
>> after Separate Binding Registration in MCoA
>>
>> Hi Ryuji,
>>
>> Ryuji Wakikawa wrote:
>>>> However, is it possible for a MN to do separate binding
>> registration
>>>> then do bulk binding refresh or bulk deregistration?
>>>
>>> Yes, MN can switch to bulk registration after the separate
>> registration.
>> [Ben] So does the HA accept this bulk registration BU from
>> the MN based on the fact that MN has previously done separate
>> binding registration?
>> Or does it do some form of CoA verification?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benjamin Lim
>>
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> ryuji
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>>
>>>> Desire
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext