Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration after Separate Binding Registration in MCoA
"Desire Oulai" <desire.oulai@ericsson.com> Thu, 18 December 2008 09:46 UTC
Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: monami6-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-monami6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E9F3A69C9;
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:46:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF3728C1B8
for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:46:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.348,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id h1MfDod8PSUq for <mext@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:46:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C623A6876
for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:46:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se
[138.85.77.51])
by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBI9oZkb009031;
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:50:38 -0600
Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by
eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:46:45 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:46:43 -0500
Message-ID: <D373F8710ACBA6419BF0B7A5177691CC05944826@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4949F309.40305@sg.panasonic.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration after Separate
Binding Registration in MCoA
Thread-Index: Aclg3TwWb3vEJfLzQ8e/bj9BPJpPqgAF6wGg
References: <mailman.87.1229544011.17522.mext@ietf.org> <D373F8710ACBA6419BF0B7A5177691CC0594479C@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
<A017101E-D3CF-414C-83AE-69F871C372B6@gmail.com>
<4949F309.40305@sg.panasonic.com>
From: "Desire Oulai" <desire.oulai@ericsson.com>
To: "Benjamin Lim" <benjamin.limck@sg.panasonic.com>,
"Ryuji Wakikawa" <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2008 09:46:45.0375 (UTC)
FILETIME=[89E8A8F0:01C960F5]
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration after Separate
Binding Registration in MCoA
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Benjamin, If initial bindings are done by separate registration, we can assume that CoA verification is done as each BU as the corresponding CoA as source address. Therefore, the MN can perform bulk re-registration or deregistration. Ruyji, should we have some text related to this in the draft? BR Desire > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Lim [mailto:benjamin.limck@sg.panasonic.com] > Sent: December 18, 2008 1:52 AM > To: Ryuji Wakikawa > Cc: Desire Oulai; mext@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration > after Separate Binding Registration in MCoA > > Hi Ryuji, > > Ryuji Wakikawa wrote: > >> However, is it possible for a MN to do separate binding > registration > >> then do bulk binding refresh or bulk deregistration? > > > > Yes, MN can switch to bulk registration after the separate > registration. > [Ben] So does the HA accept this bulk registration BU from > the MN based on the fact that MN has previously done separate > binding registration? > Or does it do some form of CoA verification? > > Regards, > Benjamin Lim > > > > > regards, > > ryuji > > > > > >> > >> > >> BR > >> > >> Desire > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MEXT mailing list > > MEXT@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
- [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration aft… Desire Oulai
- Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration… Benjamin Lim
- Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration… Desire Oulai
- Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration… Ryuji Wakikawa