IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-mops-00-01: (with COMMENT)

"Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com> Wed, 16 October 2019 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315A71201EF; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K46wTN5FqJLQ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00176a04.pphosted.com (mx0b-00176a04.pphosted.com [67.231.157.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876E6120116; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0048207.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0048207.ppops.net-00176a04. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x9GII9PA014752; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:22:54 -0400
Received: from usushmgip002.mail.tfayd.com ([216.178.109.236]) by m0048207.ppops.net-00176a04. with ESMTP id 2vka3e8edp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:22:54 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO potemwp00006.mail.tfayd.com) ([10.40.33.204]) by usushmgip002.mail.tfayd.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2019 11:22:53 -0700
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.53) by potemwp00025.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:22:51 -0600
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) by potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) with mapi id 15.01.0669.032; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:22:51 -0600
From: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "mops-chairs@ietf.org" <mops-chairs@ietf.org>, "mops@ietf.org" <mops@ietf.org>, "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
Thread-Topic: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-mops-00-01: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVhE64B8xglooyoEa8z8zu6eOfhw==
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:22:51 +0000
Message-ID: <2A1A9A19-1CE3-4817-A9D3-0AC07AC7FF3B@nbcuni.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [100.126.25.31]
x-exclaimer-md-config: 47edc00f-f2d6-45ef-be83-8a353bd47e45
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <64F665226A839847B7B562AF5304A0EA@NBCUNI.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-10-16_07:2019-10-16,2019-10-16 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1910160151
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/1YrOPzXahOBuNNbee9YtL1hkXrQ>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-mops-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:23:01 -0000

Hi,

Responses in line below

On 10/16/19, 9:55 AM, "Mops on behalf of Alvaro Retana via Datatracker" <mops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
    charter-ietf-mops-00-01: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mops/__;!c3kmrbLBmhXtig!98qSkbMMk5TeBAeGXtq5Pni-ULfG3gV-fF3rjcZmLjvK2GhtGqW8KUYu3JgG02XO$ 
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    "Where new protocols are needed, MOPS will identify appropriate venues for
    their development."
    
    It doesn't seem to be this WGs call to decide where to do new work.  As
    mentioned later in the charter, existing areas/groups already have
    responsibility in related spaces.  It should then be up to the relevant
    WGs...ADs...the IESG...to determine where new work will take place (if at all).
    
    Given the next to last paragraph...
    
       ... Media operational and deployment issues with specific protocols or
       technologies...
    
    I think that the sentence above is not needed and may lead do confusion.
    
[GD] With MOPS being focused on Media operations means it will see input, often in a not ready for other WG to see form.  The collective knowledge in MOPS would in turn hone/develop that into something better rounded out which in turn would be submitted to either existing WGs or to AD/IESG as appropriate for the situation.   The lawyers call such ideas - inchoate.    MOPS's to turn inchoate media focused ideas in to something more complete and fleshed out and ready for other groups to take a look at them. 

MOPS would not be deciding the venue for the new work, but would play a role in bringing it to the attention of the appropriate venue.  

Would this new working be better?:

           "Where new protocols are needed, MOPS will flesh out the nascent need and raise to the attention of the appropriate parties (AD/IESG)"


-glenn

    -- 
    Mops mailing list
    Mops@ietf.org
    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops__;!c3kmrbLBmhXtig!98qSkbMMk5TeBAeGXtq5Pni-ULfG3gV-fF3rjcZmLjvK2GhtGqW8KUYu3B7Bzf9x$

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email