Re: [Mops] Agenda items and times -- interim and IETF 109

[Kyle Rose <[e-mail]>]

We've completed the Doodle poll and have identified Friday, October 30 from
noon to 2 pm ET (4-6 pm UTC) as the best time for participants. I'll be
scheduling the interim via the data tracker shortly.

Thanks,
Kyle

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Leslie Daigle <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Following up the discussion from IETF 108, there were items identified for
> pursuit at an interim meeting, and ideas floated for future IETF plenary
> meeting agenda. You’ll have seen that we requested a slot for the IETF 109
> virtual meeting. With this message, I’ll outline our thinking on agenda
> items and a doodle for an interim meeting. Please fill in the doodle as
> soon as possible!
>
> IETF 109 Agenda:
>
>    - OpsCon/follow ups from the interim
>    - MeetEcho reporting on their experiences from IETF 108 (this was
>    suggested and agreed in situ by Meetecho; still need to formally ask them)
>    - (Carried over from IETF 108) Media Operations Use Case for an
>    Augmented Reality Application on Edge Computing Infrastructure Renan
>    Krishna draft-krishna-mops-ar-use-case-00
>
> Any other suggestions of things people would like on the agenda?
>
> Interim Agenda:
>
>    - draft-ietf-mops-opscons — including the scoping issue we didn’t have
>    time for at IETF 108
>
> I’d like to include an agenda item for scoping out comparative analysis of
> latency in different protocols, to follow up the lively list discussion we
> had last Fall, and the presentation material Alex Gouaillard had at IETF
> 108. But, we need a way to approach that somewhat objectively — if anyone
> has thoughts, please share.
>
> And, last but not least, here is a doodle for an interim meeting in
> October:
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/9pp7d4eq77bq967c
>
> Leslie.
>
> --
> ------------------------------
>
> Leslie Daigle
> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
> [e-mail]
>