Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Fri, 31 January 2020 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC90120A94 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:38:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.737
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.737 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fUFbpeBUJAF0 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BE5120118 for <mops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:38:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com with SMTP id p191so2298077vkf.8 for <mops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:38:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aZ0CXdDnkNivcETFCHLD8psbhK6unjM8dWXywFJE6fM=; b=q11nO846uQxBs6oBCQuQPjlLoXJaCkllQGJbSmxyjjHaIiXzrkA0zMCPy+ipb1jdK0 F9Pi633W68dpdqdXojzUN/8PpfheyvB8h2DLKrHYO8L288jYMxwICwU0+/XC96X/a9jR RSPB+/UaIZsOqaa6Y2cMu13LzcOURE6r/9voT7IOJ2vthBVLLhs/s6tTbSXjef0yTh7u K89Jjy7kTmOL0pQ1OHPk/Kkwve1Vwmh6nCdWp5P+mszbbT70bZFt285uKGvD/VU8UFhT aGzEPtL9wSI9VVFqgHw2zMk3cLi2sGdz7b8NxmMdt5lKhNP81B+POt2rnOdjsVU/7oT7 TOPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aZ0CXdDnkNivcETFCHLD8psbhK6unjM8dWXywFJE6fM=; b=JtAa9pY6bwBE29Pte69e7NgHk3+Z+0JPs3YRTkqklH5rsQQkW1Dd6zatfswIbwfDCd Z4qCxifNiuy7PgCu2vYwwEmDasktH7aBtf+k+tTwqROFpGRzzXlRmtgr5IRtSxYNFGIK wdpMcLDbgedDhWgSDR4DthSfUVU3Asxc73GPbrdaCveH1pbowhrWnnd8QiKceIfm7Db4 3yG24r6hyAtazMQvvjJ94FnyIaQ1vsDgifzz5043nid5GoYEIM9DAwzPCEd5Y7tc6XjL miWLGvpG+evXnpqKhUHSIP9gNCfJDHJx8XrA3mJHiq4A8r8S+/hkFT5qwHkKbpJNQJmf 4Gmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXMgITe2HxqjSkhMrkOhxAuSjmG0iZ0W8cf7QGD5/JYUjTqbhgM FxF8BhZ4zL5a0CnjCrXYAFwfaznjTAGZRh/8x7mK15/X
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2vyftmUCDk/xOPfoOszCTfEH8Ao1/IaK2V3b+EAe6IseOh1pTTT0G+Njtesg88DPizsnOd332TFdy4c0IP8c=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:7d43:: with SMTP id y64mr6979038vkc.15.1580492305771; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:38:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C6919186-0074-450C-8E0B-02F09E28574F@thinkingcat.com> <CACq2X+=qUDAumGhBP7k9+WQTo6OrjcKWaOy74ssHrPGRgRAQGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-f5sR6X9U7CCRn-uBKc6H5MJEaaRU+Pt-vTF2+MfkfJcA@mail.gmail.com> <B72C34B4-1032-4F08-B5F4-B7CEC3AB8D42@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <B72C34B4-1032-4F08-B5F4-B7CEC3AB8D42@thinkingcat.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:38:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZcn=sT2p4aicjK3iG6PHGkiGzRLnE-MH-wu8-TdoaHng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com>, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, mops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074b12a059d730ab2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/9oHkTAxarMyBH4eR4gTaO_RwluQ>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:38:29 -0000
I've used a Github workflow extensively for the last 4 years or more. I would welcome it in this case, it improves the likelihood that I will participate in reviewing the documents. On Fri, 31 Jan 2020, 17:34 Leslie Daigle, <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> wrote: > That’s a fair question. > > IMO, if people are generally interested in using GitHub for docs in this > WG, we should. Kyle? > > There seems to be some leaning that way, given Jake & Ali’s use so far, > but I, at least, would like to hear from others to know whether the > interest in using GitHub for documents extends beyond the authors of that > particular document? > > Leslie. > > On 30 Jan 2020, at 16:51, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > > Since we seem to be getting "support" e-mail and the 31st is tomorrow, is > it too early to ask if the working group will have its own repository for > working group drafts? > > Thanks, > > Spencer > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:25 PM Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com> wrote: > >> I support the adoption of the draft. >> >> Matt >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:45 PM Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106 MOPS >>> meeting. >>> >>> I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with comments. >>> >>> We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG item, >>> and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now. >>> >>> If anyone *objects* to adoption of the document ( >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01), please >>> share your objection now. >>> >>> If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 2020, we >>> will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons ... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Leslie. >>> >>> On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mops, >>> >>> I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy. >>> >>> I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM >>> >>> I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and >>> updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks. >>> I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but >>> I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's >>> confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when >>> you change names less often...) >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01 >>> >>> I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to co-author >>> this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very welcome. >>> >>> I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be >>> working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same points? >>> >>> Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm >>> accepting pull requests :) : >>> https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts >>> >>> Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe >>> should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now. >>> >>> Thanks and regards, >>> Jake >>> >>> -- >>> Mops mailing list >>> Mops@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Leslie Daigle >>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises >>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com >>> -- >>> Mops mailing list >>> Mops@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >>> >> >> >> -- >> [image: Limelight Networks] <https://www.limelight.com> >> Matt Stock* Principal Architect* >> EXPERIENCE FIRST. >> +1 716 949 0332 <+1+716+949+0332> >> www.limelight.com >> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/LimelightNetworks>[image: >> LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/limelight-networks>[image: >> Twitter] <https://twitter.com/llnw> >> >> -- >> Mops mailing list >> Mops@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >> > -- > Mops mailing list > Mops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops > > -- > ------------------------------ > > Leslie Daigle > Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises > ldaigle@thinkingcat.com > -- > Mops mailing list > Mops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >
- [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ie… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Davis, Scott
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Mops] [E] Confirming adoption consensus Re: … sanjay.mishra
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Matt Stock
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Holland, Jake