[Mops] Weekly github digest (MOPS Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 17 April 2022 09:15 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9674D3A0416 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 02:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=cJlr/YhV; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QTrRSlye
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiRillCn5NFP for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 02:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4CE23A040B for <mops@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 02:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823DF5C0193 for <mops@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 03:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 Apr 2022 03:37:46 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to :sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1650181066; x= 1650267466; bh=JZB2lu9U4kRw3fgiLE0GaTBYePkDs9sOFsnkc8r9NXM=; b=c Jlr/YhVvrPmx3llQtFtQ6Bdsx1alRJm8LVB6zIURbKMgZAAem2D2vLwp1xFcIKOM goWObgu0P8oD+XBEkJbAu9/18xkfJnxgu857weDy39cz6P5vexI/cnsvqNS74B6/ Eb5HCXaj64xOuUhwA3hW4HbroBOAwmOxZ23+5q/28KwzBbtd0He2dgWpHhKpiT5c PQAkpy328ZDpP5C+dLM9EG34FbGHKnWOiqZgQZVg82fl2xSKMCX3aXLqcwWv/6Ga dgP0z3Vc2kzJUzl3ar0EAbcK5iUvaexR2I9INInpT34zdx1sS1UYxgq+EJi1+5+2 cOPoPS4YnOAmes9e6IGSA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:from :in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1650181066; x=1650267466; bh=JZB2lu9U4kRw3fgiLE0GaTBYePkD s9sOFsnkc8r9NXM=; b=QTrRSlyek7KN+ImFA5pe5Ma/OYYe9ccw3InAr3/T5Bzf KAam+DrBzIdRArlfw2+rfqQAj+oCUvg1NAWuyiAcEQPKJpYW5NuEZtWzTE9faQOl +Uuia6hoUolbs15GaIefcWEfQ/fUDKXOMbiuLc9DGRNRi62Gf4flJFGYIE4Uge8A St9KhO7pNlB5isVfVfO/BXhbRUJzUHxRu/2Rk57+8DWONfhXe+6b36X0Kvf1FIwE +tlqhYIj8t+qmelwd1Mfd5leXDu19DQvPIcZYf+TO4IjNbG1aiulPxSPpTugkL6p +eEippICQCvLAonaRlZOo33u8VC11fpYlAlhx8pTfg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ysNbYpWTdR0wO3qW5oh72au9n8f5-Omb8xmcsAXcC3Dr3ljNFhxrsQ> <xme:ysNbYpnQ-bhCnmGHb__H-X_cn2VGVCT26WtAqcR0rp9ND5DBSYpKeLCRYDHoPISoh 7Ca76pEF8_liPRGHg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:ysNbYlafMyZMwhSCTBLvhFNvkQyRL_MKuYse7uF0ALWeLDEBrfqYZ9mu2nmW5GT799QnviOcZfwlCRnpIAgoMJ57XuNgd4BI-67_74Gqbjn0cAoXQuh5N8dg4ZUY8o1WBfsevg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudelkedguddvfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ysNbYsWHTWFtc9zRwpIjUFwy0KOzz6farhHdAWw-ocuJ45IT-CdVNA> <xmx:ysNbYjmR3VE6p8uaFNvzZjL-zonkH2DoClQc7-WdrnSZYzo_TgOvfQ> <xmx:ysNbYpenQrutCjX6FLricgcm_8hgc-OlcwvMwR7JQcxhdjvgnYa-0g> <xmx:ysNbYisRWZbl8mL30tLSm1nvyhtgWA_40Cp50rIBO2sEMb3MOaI2Sg>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <mops@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 03:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============3220674633198899673=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: mops@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20220417091548.D4CE23A040B@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 02:15:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/FllWsoP1gphe_GfjcwBUPY9qluA>
Subject: [Mops] Weekly github digest (MOPS Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 09:15:54 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons (+0/-15/💬56)
15 issues received 56 new comments:
- #114 Come up with a meaningful plan for "living document" that contains what's now in Section 8 (13 by GrumpyOldTroll, SpencerDawkins, acbegen, evyncke, squarooticus)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/114 [AD Review]
- #112 Reword statement about mobile operators lowering quality (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/112 [AD Review]
- #111 App level encryption is not addressed. (3 by SpencerDawkins, evyncke)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/111 [AD Review]
- #110 Eric 6.3 comments (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/110 [AD Review]
- #109 Consider moving Section 5.7 into Section 6 (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/109 [AD Review]
- #108 Break up the first sentence in 5.6 (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/108 [AD Review]
- #107 Clarify networking issues in 5.5 (2 by SpencerDawkins, evyncke)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/107 [AD Review]
- #106 Check terminology for "server-player systems" (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/106 [AD Review]
- #105 Clarify "port utilization" in 3.7 (4 by GrumpyOldTroll, SpencerDawkins, acbegen)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/105 [AD Review]
- #104 Explain end part of section 3.6 (1 by evyncke)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/104 [AD Review]
- #103 Be clear about whose traffic we're talking about in 3.2.1 (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/103 [AD Review]
- #102 Mention HTTP by middlebox as an advantage (4 by GrumpyOldTroll, SpencerDawkins, evyncke)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/102 [AD Review]
- #100 Explain why ultra low latency is <1 second (4 by GrumpyOldTroll, SpencerDawkins, evyncke)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/100 [AD Review]
- #99 Update growth numbers in Section 2 (4 by GrumpyOldTroll, SpencerDawkins, acbegen)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/99 [AD Review]
- #98 Clearer definition of "continuous"/"simultaneous" in section 1. (15 by GrumpyOldTroll, SpencerDawkins, acbegen, evyncke, gitnnelg, squarooticus)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/98 [wontfix] [AD Review]
15 issues closed:
- Reword statement about mobile operators lowering quality https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/112 [AD Review]
- Mention HTTP by middlebox as an advantage https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/102 [AD Review]
- Clean up editorials from Eric Vyncke's AD review https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/97 [AD Review]
- Clarify networking issues in 5.5 https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/107 [AD Review]
- Check terminology for "server-player systems" https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/106 [AD Review]
- Be clear about whose traffic we're talking about in 3.2.1 https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/103 [AD Review]
- Explain why ultra low latency is <1 second https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/100 [AD Review]
- Clearer definition of "continuous"/"simultaneous" in section 1. https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/98 [wontfix] [AD Review]
- Update Section 2 to be consistent with rest of doc on HTTP/3 and QUIC https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/101 [AD Review]
- Ops considerations for end-to-end encryption https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/113 [AD Review]
- Consider moving Section 5.7 into Section 6 https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/109 [AD Review]
- Explain end part of section 3.6 https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/104 [AD Review]
- Eric 6.3 comments https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/110 [AD Review]
- App level encryption is not addressed. https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/111 [AD Review]
- Break up the first sentence in 5.6 https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/issues/108 [AD Review]
Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons (+12/-11/💬4)
12 pull requests submitted:
- fix for #105 (by GrumpyOldTroll)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/128
- Issue 99 (by GrumpyOldTroll)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/127
- Fix for #102: add 'such as' to give examples of deployed caching infr… (by GrumpyOldTroll)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/126
- AD Review nits (by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/125
- Attempt at solving #112. (Also noticed the mentioned considerations … (by GrumpyOldTroll)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/124
- Holding cell for #114 (by GrumpyOldTroll)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/123
- Minor updates (by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/122
- Fix issue 110 (by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/121
- Fix issue 113 (by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/120
- Fixes issue 111 (by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/119
- fix issue 109 (by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/118
- Fix issue-108 (by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/117
4 pull requests received 4 new comments:
- #125 AD Review nits (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/125
- #124 Attempt at solving #112. (Also noticed the mentioned considerations … (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/124
- #118 fix issue 109 (1 by SpencerDawkins)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/118
- #117 Fix issue-108 (1 by GrumpyOldTroll)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/117
11 pull requests merged:
- AD Review nits
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/125
- Fix for #102: add 'such as' to give examples of deployed caching infr…
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/126
- Attempt at solving #112. (Also noticed the mentioned considerations …
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/124
- Minor updates
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/122
- Update Section 2
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/115
- Fix issue 113
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/120
- fix issue 109
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/118
- Justify inclusion of BitTorrent discussion
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/116
- Fix issue 110
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/121
- Fixes issue 111
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/119
- Fix issue-108
https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons/pull/117
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-mops/draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
- [Mops] Weekly github digest (MOPS Activity Summar… Repository Activity Summary Bot