Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 31 January 2020 18:17 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EFB12096C for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:17:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVVYhT52yws9 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03A1B120943 for <mops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id y19so5514525lfl.9 for <mops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:17:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=26y2ToKP5WWiwAqeEK6ijXno3wdxz9nEOq9takikKFM=; b=KSWmOsJWdZBXJv2znVRJ1rWrsrTa0JgIoRBi5Ixnk4/qNkZn7HyDeQW67GAsKV6PY7 Jm+TfeGQROgzg83qTCLJO3Ji7XhN/SEliRVsB1zE9iv7OPaRBFZiFxFQakpnE9r3+/Uz 3Tq6KjF7kLuY2nyWy4vKRQA4UMHqu+l4Ett1Bj8vutRNMxjXB2GE4g2cVoQAMQySt9uA Xw7hF/rc56hO9HCqdA9MvAX8vK62NEKsunHiPZX93PLng0uJLkyVepJb0BAlK3delQGM 1vxvnzi1DfqlbbJ34CnDr5LPtHqKVZHXE62FlhHIIaQk/scZEDWWF8i2FFvX+Qpbzqdr 2zQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=26y2ToKP5WWiwAqeEK6ijXno3wdxz9nEOq9takikKFM=; b=ibc69fUtExm5v5jfNM7GAYTLjvgDJcxUkAOlGyFZjFy7MnldGEbAa3rWJoMf4Rt77E 0GqUPINdGiWTVRsau3yIbzzV1PGV10QKQG4FOTDtroRRvjNn9K3rvKm+cwq4XIpa6ZhM POwh59E4blEwT3kBcXhPAsPNeni/3EPSS0gi6LWlFZ3rCXvT/80hV8pGA0OgwWDL/UZn Qfs4qva32/jnftqTpBIGXlByyngvSv6Jjx9CjZu6VDP9QgkHrcLNWSn/3ZjKJy5PoYu8 nDCNSTa361LNupd29fpUFBCZ25XLF9xGFHSoPBoelZjmV37SGETbVMPV0ggPpvDIw75f QgoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXK9u4n7OKfB5/3Uk2AqlTPP442kTt6QlV6kkhdhI1LCGpdtmtm IUmJ+n6QiXRATwf6m6SNuxWBUDsHDLqu+cHaFrU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyv9S8YWfERL4NJQFwVSR2T+M2eUyVd1ihACPOpvfTi9SyoKaYwu8vJFebsVv/zL9wh72RfgifpUgyYcSIZ4EE=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5e29:: with SMTP id o9mr6154707lfg.81.1580494656037; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:17:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C6919186-0074-450C-8E0B-02F09E28574F@thinkingcat.com> <CACq2X+=qUDAumGhBP7k9+WQTo6OrjcKWaOy74ssHrPGRgRAQGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-f5sR6X9U7CCRn-uBKc6H5MJEaaRU+Pt-vTF2+MfkfJcA@mail.gmail.com> <B72C34B4-1032-4F08-B5F4-B7CEC3AB8D42@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <B72C34B4-1032-4F08-B5F4-B7CEC3AB8D42@thinkingcat.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:17:09 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-e6BeToRFWvOEOVurPo1k4cghDnkDeS4LkTjhKP32Oa7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
Cc: Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com>, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, mops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008ae61e059d739637"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/GZlzxKInTmtdQBmMc98CKVU2ZKQ>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:17:41 -0000
Hi, Leslie, On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:34 AM Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> wrote: > That’s a fair question. > > IMO, if people are generally interested in using GitHub for docs in this > WG, we should. Kyle? > > There seems to be some leaning that way, given Jake & Ali’s use so far, > but I, at least, would like to hear from others to know whether the > interest in using GitHub for documents extends beyond the authors of that > particular document? > I certainly am (I have a PR waiting for that particular document now, but I don't know why we would not want to use Github for other docs). I'd also note that Ali has at least a few issues in Jake's repository now, and I've been waiting to see if the repository would change upon adoption before adding issues of my own. Best, Spencer > Leslie. > > On 30 Jan 2020, at 16:51, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > > Since we seem to be getting "support" e-mail and the 31st is tomorrow, is > it too early to ask if the working group will have its own repository for > working group drafts? > > Thanks, > > Spencer > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:25 PM Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com> wrote: > >> I support the adoption of the draft. >> >> Matt >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:45 PM Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106 MOPS >>> meeting. >>> >>> I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with comments. >>> >>> We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG item, >>> and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now. >>> >>> If anyone *objects* to adoption of the document ( >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01), please >>> share your objection now. >>> >>> If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 2020, we >>> will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons ... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Leslie. >>> >>> On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mops, >>> >>> I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy. >>> >>> I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM >>> >>> I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and >>> updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks. >>> I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but >>> I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's >>> confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when >>> you change names less often...) >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01 >>> >>> I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to co-author >>> this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very welcome. >>> >>> I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be >>> working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same points? >>> >>> Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm >>> accepting pull requests :) : >>> https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts >>> >>> Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe >>> should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now. >>> >>> Thanks and regards, >>> Jake >>> >>> -- >>> Mops mailing list >>> Mops@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Leslie Daigle >>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises >>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com >>> -- >>> Mops mailing list >>> Mops@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >>> >> >> >> -- >> [image: Limelight Networks] <https://www.limelight.com> >> Matt Stock* Principal Architect* >> EXPERIENCE FIRST. >> +1 716 949 0332 <+1+716+949+0332> >> www.limelight.com >> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/LimelightNetworks>[image: >> LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/limelight-networks>[image: >> Twitter] <https://twitter.com/llnw> >> >> -- >> Mops mailing list >> Mops@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >> > -- > Mops mailing list > Mops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops > > -- > ------------------------------ > > Leslie Daigle > Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises > ldaigle@thinkingcat.com >
- [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ie… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Davis, Scott
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Mops] [E] Confirming adoption consensus Re: … sanjay.mishra
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Matt Stock
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Holland, Jake