Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Wed, 22 January 2020 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE1412082D for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:20:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m5-OzPiw6ex0 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88086120829 for <mops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id u14so29884vsu.3 for <mops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:20:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tMw8ZeOofCodTMuhqfqQK73PQwJr/FLz6kCe0U+cQdI=; b=VJxrXj2bSDv+GdPtZ8bX5ByROKNc0xoVTprD0MZZttR7Y4Utq2gv3aGKUyiVpg/aFz EA2zPCfPj+0Ql+HKJTYXiPi3CvmqSlYFOmBzRTSK8rJtxm+o6hx2vHUUqPo+Menw/l2L yMlokMDlOSA7eq1m/Ehah6nEcp/C+xTvTu0RufeTyAcvIXadUGcaS6BAjJkzW4ry67S6 6kVeyryNHMHVRkPytp71BvmzdqEZGy9yjNwa/IPoH1+8T7rfk3GAFMuYFYLLwrEAQlNs qTh4oJvaPg5gnVBS3vFktXnAIEjYsqtQSZI9uLUfk5Aw1jwRRwkNpHOqUsytYtke450S lFMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tMw8ZeOofCodTMuhqfqQK73PQwJr/FLz6kCe0U+cQdI=; b=RNgSik/I1eLvOS8/EuHG1uPts6GJsWA1bT5+og4bRZpMpPP13sM+miXa8TJ6Lmn2kM 75mkldCFHJfEXYeGK6ngA4QxmZ8d8OMaOUNhGJ8EsGf1+qyMy9+aFS1KVOirIWv9WjsC Is+flIO+DVVN9WZwuLvii6m33g2a4DlXX0eVVeoKqmTvDU1DnDM8sJDoKLGsPD02jxZr sRRkwvPgIPuytt27mu6tiEvxClKa2HC80kN0QrWV4gKfHWS9VwzcVMpOSd46TUdJDHuo qtxErV4ZyS7ljoPcp6ToO0KhIo+pnuxuynpN9iidgXAgyIezNcswk2mQbSvtd7woKyMw PFyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW/W7KqX9huzFbbQsUSaCbFn4u0OJPC6/HDSxJ4V9m3+duCU8SK Ta2eNxHFsRFuoxmWXVTpELcgc43G8+HrHLzbbif3EhMd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8cZSTshre5R6YIaLfwfPwhQ9+2Un4lWTUGmoFLH5R/3UVLW/FWVyTC3YqDnwDw9kkjljAGJTLYBQH/WlEbHo=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e2ca:: with SMTP id i10mr3573272vsm.15.1579717231509; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:20:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C6919186-0074-450C-8E0B-02F09E28574F@thinkingcat.com> <3A53CF4A-AEC8-4D44-BC5D-A02B7DB6E0AC@cisco.com> <f208a9f6c17c46c9964f158182e147b3@NCEMEXGP034.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
In-Reply-To: <f208a9f6c17c46c9964f158182e147b3@NCEMEXGP034.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:20:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oaMK649gzwjvd2wuDixWLbBSj_aWGWBYZavWn1yQ9rvOw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Davis, Scott" <Scott.Davis1@charter.com>
Cc: "mops@ietf.org" <mops@ietf.org>, "Blackburn, Bob J" <Bob.Blackburn@charter.com>, "DuBose, Kreig D" <Kreig.DuBose@charter.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e06e3059cbe94a8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/HsdS2odj7afzcVu-Pjcfp0Sy-kM>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:20:34 -0000
I support adoption. Thanks for writing this up and presenting it to the group Lucas On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 17:44 Davis, Scott, <Scott.Davis1@charter.com> wrote: > I support the adoption of the document. It is a reasonable beginning > > > > S > > > > Scott M Davis > > Technology, Media, and Innovation > > > > > > > > > > *From: *Mops <mops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Leslie Daigle < > ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, 21 January 2020 at 20:45 > *To: *"mops@ietf.org" <mops@ietf.org> > *Cc: *Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> > *Subject: *[Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: > draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons > > > > Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106 MOPS > meeting. > > I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with comments. > > We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG item, > and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now. > > If anyone *objects* to adoption of the document ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01), please > share your objection now. > > If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 2020, we > will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons . > > Thanks, > Leslie. > > On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote: > > Hi Mops, > > I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy. > > I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM > > I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and > updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks. > I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but > I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's > confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when > you change names less often...) > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01 > > I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to co-author > this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very welcome. > > I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be > working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same points? > > Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm > accepting pull requests :) : > https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts > > Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe > should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now. > > Thanks and regards, > Jake > > -- > Mops mailing list > Mops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops > > -- > ------------------------------ > > Leslie Daigle > Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises > ldaigle@thinkingcat.com > The contents of this e-mail message and > any attachments are intended solely for the > addressee(s) and may contain confidential > and/or legally privileged information. If you > are not the intended recipient of this message > or if this message has been addressed to you > in error, please immediately alert the sender > by reply e-mail and then delete this message > and any attachments. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are notified that > any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, > or storage of this message or any attachment > is strictly prohibited. > -- > Mops mailing list > Mops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops >
- [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ie… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Davis, Scott
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Mops] [E] Confirming adoption consensus Re: … sanjay.mishra
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Matt Stock
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draf… Holland, Jake