[Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-mops-00-01: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 16 October 2019 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mops@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8528A1207FD; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: mops-chairs@ietf.org, mops@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.105.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <157124492848.7863.17435697410548400491.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:55:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/OW2C0ejVURxJSbBnhOwzAeQ1KIM>
Subject: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-mops-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:55:29 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-mops-00-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mops/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"Where new protocols are needed, MOPS will identify appropriate venues for
their development."

It doesn't seem to be this WGs call to decide where to do new work.  As
mentioned later in the charter, existing areas/groups already have
responsibility in related spaces.  It should then be up to the relevant
WGs...ADs...the IESG...to determine where new work will take place (if at all).

Given the next to last paragraph...

   ... Media operational and deployment issues with specific protocols or
   technologies...

I think that the sentence above is not needed and may lead do confusion.