Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons

Since we seem to be getting "support" e-mail and the 31st is tomorrow, is
it too early to ask if the working group will have its own repository for
working group drafts?

Thanks,

Spencer

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:25 PM Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com> wrote:

> I support the adoption of the draft.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:45 PM Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106 MOPS
>> meeting.
>>
>> I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with comments.
>>
>> We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG item,
>> and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now.
>>
>> If anyone *objects* to adoption of the document (
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01), please
>> share your objection now.
>>
>> If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 2020, we
>> will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons ..
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leslie.
>>
>> On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mops,
>>
>> I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy.
>>
>> I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM
>>
>> I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and
>> updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks.
>> I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but
>> I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's
>> confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when
>> you change names less often...)
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01
>>
>> I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to co-author
>> this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very welcome.
>>
>> I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be
>> working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same points?
>>
>> Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm
>> accepting pull requests :) :
>> https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts
>>
>> Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe
>> should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now.
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Jake
>>
>> --
>> Mops mailing list
>> Mops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Leslie Daigle
>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
>> --
>> Mops mailing list
>> Mops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>
>
>
> --
> [image: Limelight Networks] <https://www.limelight.com>
> Matt Stock* Principal Architect*
> EXPERIENCE FIRST.
> +1 716 949 0332 <+1+716+949+0332>
> www.limelight.com
> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/LimelightNetworks>[image:
> LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/limelight-networks>[image:
> Twitter] <https://twitter.com/llnw>
>
> --
> Mops mailing list
> Mops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>