Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons

I'll look into the right way to set this up. I'm not sure that the QUIC
single-repo model makes sense here, but one or more official MOPS repos for
adopted docs seems like a good idea.

Kyle

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:17 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Leslie,
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:34 AM Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That’s a fair question.
>>
>> IMO, if people are generally interested in using GitHub for docs in this
>> WG, we should. Kyle?
>>
>> There seems to be some leaning that way, given Jake & Ali’s use so far,
>> but I, at least, would like to hear from others to know whether the
>> interest in using GitHub for documents extends beyond the authors of that
>> particular document?
>>
> I certainly am (I have a PR waiting for that particular document now, but
> I don't know why we would not want to use Github for other docs).
>
> I'd also note that Ali has at least a few issues in Jake's repository now,
> and I've been waiting to see if the repository would change upon adoption
> before adding issues of my own.
>
> Best,
>
> Spencer
>
>> Leslie.
>>
>> On 30 Jan 2020, at 16:51, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>>
>> Since we seem to be getting "support" e-mail and the 31st is tomorrow, is
>> it too early to ask if the working group will have its own repository for
>> working group drafts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Spencer
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:25 PM Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I support the adoption of the draft.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:45 PM Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106
>>>> MOPS meeting.
>>>>
>>>> I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with comments.
>>>>
>>>> We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG
>>>> item, and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now.
>>>>
>>>> If anyone *objects* to adoption of the document (
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01), please
>>>> share your objection now.
>>>>
>>>> If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 2020,
>>>> we will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Leslie.
>>>>
>>>> On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mops,
>>>>
>>>> I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy.
>>>>
>>>> I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting:
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM
>>>>
>>>> I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and
>>>> updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks.
>>>> I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but
>>>> I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's
>>>> confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when
>>>> you change names less often...)
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01
>>>>
>>>> I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to co-author
>>>> this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very welcome.
>>>>
>>>> I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be
>>>> working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same points?
>>>>
>>>> Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm
>>>> accepting pull requests :) :
>>>> https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts
>>>>
>>>> Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe
>>>> should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>> Jake
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mops mailing list
>>>> Mops@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Leslie Daigle
>>>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
>>>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
>>>> --
>>>> Mops mailing list
>>>> Mops@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> [image: Limelight Networks] <https://www.limelight.com>
>>> Matt Stock* Principal Architect*
>>> EXPERIENCE FIRST.
>>> +1 716 949 0332 <+1+716+949+0332>
>>> www.limelight.com
>>> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/LimelightNetworks>[image:
>>> LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/limelight-networks>[image:
>>> Twitter] <https://twitter.com/llnw>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mops mailing list
>>> Mops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>>
>> --
>> Mops mailing list
>> Mops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Leslie Daigle
>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
>>
>