IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Mops] Low latency protocol comparision

Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Sat, 13 June 2020 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3293A0B92 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTXWq7nLsZAA for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (giant.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06AC3A0B8D for <mops@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E258640C83; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:58:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (100-97-68-20.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.97.68.20]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C9AD9640BDF; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:58:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:58:36 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Illegal-Fumbling: 06161cbb26c450e0_1592067516275_1622519090
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1592067516275:3392727918
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1592067516275
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAE083102; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= thinkingcat.com; bh=GEBQpbohzQpKo0zaj3qm7uPwAn4=; b=kqbw5xX5KpFZ c6iQpl6ga+G0L0WouE2XmrVllgYymSJsagYD62v0F2YsCG6v6LaZnFxLEDHsWZhv X89ZViiwUoM3JYockexbrxzb2RLeg2soRhuHdYVmFQ5jQEkl8mxdZWe0c5qAplTU G/XwBOAHC9eYNz8orxKr9ntlA4VlG8c=
Received: from [192.168.1.57] (vtelinet-216-66-102-83.vermontel.net [216.66.102.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ldaigle@thinkingcat.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD76C830BB; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a61
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: mops@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:58:25 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <9EAA7716-147D-4A93-81F5-5969ABEBAB3B@thinkingcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_C0B1E970-99DC-4F50-B782-06620AD938F2_="
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudeifedguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffoffkgggtsegrtdhmreertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfejhfeuhfekjefgveevfefghfetfeeitdefteejueekffdulefggeeulefhudehnecuffhomhgrihhnpegvlhgvtggrrhgurdgtohhmnecukfhppedvudeirdeiiedruddtvddrkeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurdehjegnpdhinhgvthepvdduiedrieeirddutddvrdekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthhepfdfnvghslhhivgcuffgrihhglhgvfdcuoehluggrihhglhgvsehthhhinhhkihhnghgtrghtrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehluggrihhglhgvsehthhhinhhkihhnghgtrghtrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehluggrihhglhgvsehthhhinhhkihhnghgtrghtrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/raPZn-zH94Lf0olxoF2GhIreOns>
Subject: [Mops] Low latency protocol comparision
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:58:43 -0000

I thought this was a pretty interesting analysis:

Low broadcast latency and protocols for implementation thereof:
https://www.elecard.com/page/low_broadcast_latency_and_protocols_for_implementation_thereof

Particularly telling is the chart at the end:  WebRTC and SRT don’t 
look very similar, in this particular regard.

Leslie.

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email