Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons

"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Fri, 31 January 2020 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB89F120A94 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:34:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PUOdW3IMV_kS for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bongo.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (bongo.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3C5120A96 for <mops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:34:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE365010DB; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:34:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-216-4.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.216.4]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6865E500CCB; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a5.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.5); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:34:12 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Turn-Robust: 1776246666998c51_1580492051916_2399965502
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1580492051916:931967386
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1580492051916
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73077F62F; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:34:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=8 tj9cHUvXrTNQVbRLDKFAG/RxPU=; b=nF9wLUL7/G7JLqaWUbzfHuTSuOLpF6W5L HZmZngBiBdmMrp4od4lBeUnlB7V0jarVuQ/6rOBHsuqXLWAKk+bDdut35uxyUy2+ TjFHXnwi9EsnciUmVsGoZekxLc5rmp4uindgTy6NHNGE4MZJycUd3wMjCI3sNPCA s15jTTqpbc=
Received: from [169.254.170.230] (vtelinet-216-66-102-83.vermontel.net [216.66.102.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ldaigle@thinkingcat.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A78AB7F62C; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:34:06 -0800 (PST)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a5
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com>, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, mops@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:33:55 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <B72C34B4-1032-4F08-B5F4-B7CEC3AB8D42@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-f5sR6X9U7CCRn-uBKc6H5MJEaaRU+Pt-vTF2+MfkfJcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C6919186-0074-450C-8E0B-02F09E28574F@thinkingcat.com> <CACq2X+=qUDAumGhBP7k9+WQTo6OrjcKWaOy74ssHrPGRgRAQGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-f5sR6X9U7CCRn-uBKc6H5MJEaaRU+Pt-vTF2+MfkfJcA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_9B1D6F2F-6C68-4E0A-B069-7374CDFF5E45_="
Embedded-HTML: [{"HTML":[845, 7641], "plain":[433, 3239], "uuid":"3D51C2F0-8EED-46FC-B337-6F3D8265FE99"}]
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrgedtgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffokfgjfhggtgfgsegrkehmreertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdphihouhhtuhgsvgdrtghomhdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhlihhmvghlihhghhhtrdgtohhmpdhfrggtvggsohhokhdrtghomhdplhhinhhkvgguihhnrdgtohhmpdhtfihithhtvghrrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvudeirdeiiedruddtvddrkeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplgduieelrddvheegrddujedtrddvfedtngdpihhnvghtpedvudeirdeiiedruddtvddrkeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtoheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomh
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/ubEWSGK0ovb5sjYq9x4WnHYblbw>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:34:16 -0000


That’s a fair question.

IMO, if people are generally interested in using GitHub for docs in this 
WG, we should.   Kyle?

There seems to be some leaning that way, given Jake & Ali’s use so 
far, but I, at least, would like to hear from others to know whether the 
interest in using GitHub for documents extends beyond the authors of 
that particular document?

Leslie.

On 30 Jan 2020, at 16:51, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:

> Since we seem to be getting "support" e-mail and the 31st is tomorrow, 
> is
> it too early to ask if the working group will have its own repository 
> for
> working group drafts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Spencer
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:25 PM Matt Stock <mstock@llnw.com> wrote:
>
>> I support the adoption of the draft.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:45 PM Leslie Daigle 
>> <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106 
>>> MOPS
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>> I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with 
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG 
>>> item,
>>> and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now.
>>>
>>> If anyone *objects* to adoption of the document (
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01), please
>>> share your objection now.
>>>
>>> If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 
>>> 2020, we
>>> will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons ..
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Leslie.
>>>
>>> On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mops,
>>>
>>> I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy.
>>>
>>> I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM
>>>
>>> I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and
>>> updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks.
>>> I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but
>>> I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's
>>> confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when
>>> you change names less often...)
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01
>>>
>>> I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to 
>>> co-author
>>> this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very 
>>> welcome.
>>>
>>> I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be
>>> working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same 
>>> points?
>>>
>>> Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm
>>> accepting pull requests :) :
>>> https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts
>>>
>>> Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe
>>> should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now.
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Jake
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mops mailing list
>>> Mops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Leslie Daigle
>>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
>>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
>>> --
>>> Mops mailing list
>>> Mops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> [image: Limelight Networks] <https://www.limelight.com>
>> Matt Stock* Principal Architect*
>> EXPERIENCE FIRST.
>> +1 716 949 0332 <+1+716+949+0332>
>> www.limelight.com
>> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/LimelightNetworks>[image:
>> LinkedIn] 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/limelight-networks>[image:
>> Twitter] <https://twitter.com/llnw>
>>
>> --
>> Mops mailing list
>> Mops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>>


> -- 
> Mops mailing list
> Mops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------