Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-mops-00-01: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 16 October 2019 22:11 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1956C120052; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osSs7dWZYuwz; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3CB12004A; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id h33so15324edh.12; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JjSpZD/ImICnarFb4Jg8g4+B5f7LZS44DcuLnKKIgkg=; b=iFgSSfyhOwmSBQPvqI853OexTM0sB5S3KtDzvV+Aoh9Pscrg+5StdlBgldiIH4SK3n mWEGp0uoBqA3cxlTPXvIaM75xghngH7wKOZ9lmkVIRVrqHFQS3TnV6Cf3LNFsH6/K9uE 0S5L8f1NXALDsP3V+uox0kzx/cho0PknvmJtUGEGcITkaZqInL2vRNXQZG/ppRo/HXJ6 tXPLmWXJ/kZcBjefZNNbV7XGdtpRCJPpaZAGZOvQ9cxWpsJFq5hbGEKTs86+/RMl00Mz gBZp2YYWUYi0siavYixnpF1G48ASdeacGemUJopqSKQhYOCkbcEjUrLOXX6WqFnKnBuw vv+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JjSpZD/ImICnarFb4Jg8g4+B5f7LZS44DcuLnKKIgkg=; b=Es+NQneT077dK/WveGDCUAIicLoSEBobaM3rpez6jyznGtKZ4jaDpFhKok8tBZFVq0 QgWHlZeT1N6u+ak18oaFvKRyqbYHLvQI5NwvZ6KXEhkj7hnft0q4O6Ejjfmzu9M79lfr Kz2wwYwBQ38MBDqKPJFIo8Qi5jfrOvDVQUixYvsu0ildcHLxo7VwDhG1cY4zCFLGtm0v eHRHN5UG2bAD4w7SZYQBCOh3tZjJdVaPLLTkuj0uP30/HSN2UYZrYEclCiJ7M6uA+Tjj znI1adQ0wlAUQAJ4jjZLLrePdqRV5TyiKxp05lst+TNxUcvCZccBckbrs7rRvNKKveQy DEHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8i36HFtT4tVuEHaUEdPma8TxXAUvvyYQazPAwb7YsHOE3N5VJ 5pbE/XDZX9ooJNPrF4tjt0LbO4eRG8ypjdU+eZU3vg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzvfyROi9fRGGbI4qvppE1VeQ6i1MjMTeWevCy0bCvTxnoC8oCN4R9GtqDRh9wsGt83ZWJe0xKMk+E3wrRViKk=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:cb86:: with SMTP id k6mr492512edi.270.1571263867727; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:11:07 +0200
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nX8uChZyTuGePoU4D4aJLuT9tdiE1tLbTOw-UEiEX8jLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <157124492848.7863.17435697410548400491.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJU8_nX8uChZyTuGePoU4D4aJLuT9tdiE1tLbTOw-UEiEX8jLQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:11:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMMESswNeDXnWa_W7WEG9NECV4FDFV6CbDHKn_ayovdVH3SAFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Cc: mops@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mops-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af330505950e6042"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/y9-P7x0i0iBfH2h9PNwEmvahWQk>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-mops-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 22:11:11 -0000
On October 16, 2019 at 1:19:25 PM, Kyle Rose (krose@krose.org) wrote: "Where new protocols are needed, MOPS will identify appropriate venues for their development." It doesn't seem to be this WGs call to decide where to do new work. As mentioned later in the charter, existing areas/groups already have responsibility in related spaces. It should then be up to the relevant WGs...ADs...the IESG...to determine where new work will take place (if at all). How about "help identify candidate venues for their development"? I think the idea is to make it easier for WG participants to bootstrap the process of finding an appropriate venue within the IETF for their work. That works too. Thanks! Alvaro.
- [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ie… Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
- Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charte… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charte… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charte… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Mops] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charte… Alvaro Retana