Re: [Moq] Charter adjustment

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 25 July 2022 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E477C157B48 for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BSp3c7Q2Cf3c for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449FEC15A729 for <moq@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id n138so8280979iod.4 for <moq@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xtUtDuKluy2sFRMGFX5CfgxTVs/eeeTmHxsP9h7LSzA=; b=LhPNj/HL/l7J7SpXJaBApS09jXhGzg0c1dZUvSPdZHFpBtXMzNpnIABc66t14KwP54 8makc5cfFEzvxBOQrjJhQ/4SsiF5Cl8vNa8rPb0niJqT1qbz77CeeTlEZNyJm9vebTZt zP7lGUz7ueYFEaneeVOVfjwvQRkmwMOuvhw3eS7xvNmnl28dYYgq+hv9zsMRgcYC3MkJ n6K5Smmhl1qnnNOICoQ+CQR6ue3D3gDDal7s+mz2H/EsFlnlodiy55qF6PJoFbPQsDCV OxFX+SrqTVZYjd+QTfErlj1sYdmeW2reXuovG+fpDbXfTeEz+VRPV/6TKJA7FERPVQie hIrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xtUtDuKluy2sFRMGFX5CfgxTVs/eeeTmHxsP9h7LSzA=; b=BRKTd81RykkLSOyUzAwgvuqtJIpuXgKLp9uCA97agK8vAYOhLu32AA8tMV23FqGxzM ixNrphfZ4lLpUg6BD9CeJA6E2GK2R3Ul4GYEzCEjbWKI3IWX2xiyd5OAux4+A34pV5fF sIDXgn5j2XudM7ygFpXmeE6XT10IP08mDcApY0+TGA4A+FoIQXFp7F++pcDqOAWNcSjz 64LbjSTAtcbDSRY8IGShT5M3ZxNZvrIHB1yK/l7KKLkG2JXhmVxKtvzAyBDcjaEX2PHv 7qcSxP9Po3DJPwrqUQ8rjYgaipU8bcE8prK19RWf6PlM3o+iSUPnS/hL40M8D0kvzwS4 XdzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+v58FE/Don7p/AeCZJvwiiaDltbzBQJo1WgCBNCjAxBqqWUa52 V6aK2/fwAUxzzg/eI+Zhc0v4XYjjEVOGa4H4Ejg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vGlYTiCiAP++V/OhTb6MuN9g3RVAjhV9cW7Y3Z17d2xy4URB/eJCz0DBo6p8Qi81xT0hvaRZ+jIhPKwW9hiok=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:35aa:b0:341:610d:5a44 with SMTP id v42-20020a05663835aa00b00341610d5a44mr4679699jal.37.1658739258465; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMAr=dMSg9efcYBd5QZquvDhYcQi_gibyttxjqcxvWZKMw@mail.gmail.com> <511BF9AE-C84B-4AC2-9430-B268979078B4@networked.media> <CAMRcRGRGR3bXroZch4DAgeN65GodUp2J4=44pvB-6_ieGLKDTg@mail.gmail.com> <BN7PR11MB275378CDC1463041BB4E71CEB4919@BN7PR11MB2753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CALGR9oaFWKvjaHg_bjoTFFMavpwAWLLe2FEGyLzNcYFqxWHswg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGTs8UPLHzw9PiJB2rOh8MwE402LvBi+xRXbnVdrx2sSwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGRdTk_kXnd=s5ZB0XuHTRtTH0xPir3hJkBprAV70dtsTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gMbWtbJe=kcbCXxAphLpiaiGHQPcm=00Tqoioh2SC6VZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2dvwEr3uZ0BKJeOO9eYHJhYZsZ4w_hWVckG5n4F6bSJ_2g@mail.gmail.com> <b2312817-f859-53f8-0fba-307c71ac05e7@huitema.net> <CAOW+2ds02i_MUJoBP0L7-3R5GfCtgmXhTpES6Da_LE-c_+ZZUw@mail.gmail.com> <d9d0ca62-e3e6-15fc-9f5a-fd29640aad46@huitema.net> <YT2PR01MB59336F54BD433E901637D22EB2909@YT2PR01MB5933.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CA+9kkMAkV51Sc9QNqSe8oWVOJ_br_Z0T1sZwuy2XwtSuqTrAXw@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oYYx3f8XpwhRghN4z=UfrSDU4HJdVpz9DjUFjMD2NkAAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gNDUzsJ9p2-raiVYoEDnbOfb2D0mFgwkdaZ0t37X6ZGcw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gNDUzsJ9p2-raiVYoEDnbOfb2D0mFgwkdaZ0t37X6ZGcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:53:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMB2+29c=RHXvj0Fg0SZZUwT6tgcahvNiae3rEmaj=691Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Cc: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, MOQ Mailing List <moq@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000046a6b805e49d5434"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/moq/SsJ1k1lA6MBI2mRnLlqXtpovIwU>
Subject: Re: [Moq] Charter adjustment
X-BeenThere: moq@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media over QUIC <moq.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/moq/>
List-Post: <mailto:moq@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 08:54:54 -0000

I think this has converged, so I have updated the PR.  I plan to merge the
text and upload the new version of the charter to the datatracker at 13:30
Philadelphia time.  If you think this is urgently wrong, please shout.
Otherwise, we can update the text further during the meeting discussion.

regards,

Ted

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 5:52 PM Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> wrote:

> LGTM as well, thanks Ted.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:09 AM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ted
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, 06:47 Ted Hardie, <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> While I appreciate all the additional thinking in this thread, I think I
>>> still need to have a clear answer on what to do about the charter text
>>> (sorry, BoF chair priorities).  We can:
>>>
>>> Leave on-path in
>>> Change on-path to something that does not have the same lower-layer
>>> implications, but does retain the implication of a coordinated set through
>>> whom the data flows
>>> Remove it entirely.
>>>
>>> Based on the discussion so far, my proposal is to adjust this to:
>>>
>>> "The working group will define MoQ so that the media publication
>>> protocol can leverage coordinating relays/caches wherever applicable to
>>> improve the delivery performance."
>>>
>>> I think that addresses Ali's initial concern, removes my concern that we
>>> will be signing up to unrelated work (like DNS query traffic), leaves the
>>> CDNI problem space outside, and generally goes along with the discussion to
>>> date.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts before I update the PR?
>>>
>>
>> That text works for me. Thank you.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Lucas
>> --
>> Moq mailing list
>> Moq@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
>>
>