Re: [Moq] [EXTERNAL] Re: Encrypted Media Metadata

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 July 2022 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901F3C138FCA for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HahVVwK6kxZd for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00E76C1527B7 for <moq@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id gn24so2417084pjb.3 for <moq@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uSMrgVTL6hAwdZB01liMGPWgxO9H1EkmVP+m7SfYogQ=; b=gS0j1NXs81kBU2OxwPX/5y6d64TM+CSdV2dmex9fO0bSuZswnj65eh4JRTkETQVBKL sgn3skAiKzesabiI9RTWzf5RVC9gtrA2yO29jxdZx0SC8uQFqh9UVUDVAFUwMBYnoyTc AgTqbziz7q3TpeNnCBJrZzrds1zF5a8LCYKwgneUDIt4AED1nxL//SDpz3ffD6sBlVFJ T5N8iI/r1z/xgVn9B/ELJlHave3RYyHurHLsHpiJJe52/AwuSaqwneaOBGIJ+Rb9JFiD 1wzlbvEPWL2HMCvunwyimNFPROVeF+ebgZwLPxgnaRK3NSqolWUi369BucRr6UNANBTa 10LA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uSMrgVTL6hAwdZB01liMGPWgxO9H1EkmVP+m7SfYogQ=; b=o4fbyNy+xR72v+1y+R6uoc8HlwFq07ycmkuR81Zp1mOj/Emomk5ht6Th7LuLLcDnlt 5m74wM1beOSNrKrvVrZWLGe1NxxoVViTzyoD1IXmHGI2ayo0l3zsJNKtQeOzZfHT1dWO w0/sWTjw+8v4bcRSns8VHap+KJouqMT2glOZlfv8p6PKDiLjhqm/6FxcwXiPoATCr5t6 4QhSnCrE4JIjwTG3AKYdiyrdV10i0T5Wn7NxFpNe/owSaAt/9sKrqtzyht4xIBQhdSNQ 01VdZ9ZO+DYgTL+OxaX0+iEzaQPfovqw8coBAyjWMtUEt5CXxvUkkM9yhZ+Mg/Gq3bC7 UJCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9IL/PBAPmoAuHcYADBJn1HeubzCDsQiVbhHTTtunYE3hIsy3hc XXuuRzeQxLbtzLGVotc5lc3x/f3NZsW3ylPxszU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sqNnaGXu+zDMfRtV3hMQFLjkch2KcuI7zzuFdHn/Esa7RX0ZMO1PB0gXrx5GiohgkHVxfgir8RrTY+a27k3jc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e4d:b0:1f0:462b:b531 with SMTP id pi13-20020a17090b1e4d00b001f0462bb531mr13174647pjb.34.1658429995423; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <LV2PR11MB604522717FFF34A5D066A9EEEA8D9@LV2PR11MB6045.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMC+Zx-a=WLo+zQuw3f1=JnEGUKTR3pF2ONt94L_eZYVoA@mail.gmail.com> <LV2PR11MB6045416F5B2A573D5A740E34EA919@LV2PR11MB6045.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMAsRi8jRWavBC798N8KFG5BqT4_hPF89mpQUzTQcsqWog@mail.gmail.com> <LV2PR11MB6045F688C8B5B8C22374BEBDEA919@LV2PR11MB6045.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <LV2PR11MB6045F688C8B5B8C22374BEBDEA919@LV2PR11MB6045.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:59:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGQfyY385ys5bRdh5_exNbB6-MVMZx3VjBTrk3Jq-u=W7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Deen, Glenn" <Glenn_Deen=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "MoQ@ietf.org" <moq@ietf.org>, "Deen, Glenn" <Glenn_Deen@comcast.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c31c7e05e455523e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/moq/lMCITy9y4fSnuZ5w7ubDFjPE8xM>
Subject: Re: [Moq] [EXTERNAL] Re: Encrypted Media Metadata
X-BeenThere: moq@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media over QUIC <moq.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/moq/>
List-Post: <mailto:moq@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:59:59 -0000

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 6:32 AM Deen, Glenn <Glenn_Deen=
40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> In line
>
>
>
> On 7/21/22, 6:17 AM, "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Glenn,
>
>
>
> In-line.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 1:35 PM Deen, Glenn <Glenn_Deen@comcast.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ted,
>
>
>
> Perhaps replacing the “timed metadata, such as … “ with just “metadata” to
> cover the broad range of metadata
>
>
>
> So:
>
> The media publication protocol will be a push protocol for sending media
> including audio, video, and timed metadata, such as closed captions and cue
> points. The common protocol for publishing media over ingest and
> distribution will support:
>
> Becomes:
>
> The media publication protocol will be a push protocol for sending media
> including audio, video, and metadata. The common protocol for publishing
> media over ingest and distribution will support:
>
> I think the two examples given (closed captions and cue points) are pretty
> important to retain and that "timed metadata" there indicates how they are
> linked to other data.  Would it be possible to replace that change with one
> that refers to a broader class of metadata with different links?
>
>
>
> Fair enough, what then if we made it inclusive:    “audio, video, and
> metadata including timed metadata such as closed captions and cue points,
> and broader metadata that may include content data, encoding data,
> distribution data as some examples”
>

Hi Glenn, for my better understand can you please expand a bit more on
these terms "content data, encoding data, distribution data"



>
> -glenn
>
>
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> Ted
>
>
>
>
>
> And add “metadata transport” as a bullet, so as to suggest that metadata
> is a first class data element being included.
>
>
>
> -glenn
>
>
>
> On 7/21/22, 2:16 AM, "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Glenn,
>
>
>
> I think I follow your core concern, but I'm a little confused about how to
> reflect it in the charter in ways that don't start to assume the solution
> space.  From your perspective are you looking for an elaboration to one of
> these bullets:
>
>
>
> The media publication protocol will be a push protocol for sending media
> including audio, video, and timed metadata, such as closed captions and cue
> points. The common protocol for publishing media over ingest and
> distribution will support:
>
> ·         one or more media formats,
>
> ·         an interoperable way to request media and encodings,
>
> ·         rate adaption strategies based on changing codec rates,
> changing chosen media encoding/qualities,
>
> ·         cache friendly media mechanisms
>
> So that they specifically mention the metadata in, for example, the bullet
> about requesting media and encodings?  Or are you looking to add a bullet
> here?
>
>
>
> If you have charter text in mind, or can develop some, that would be most
> helpful.
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
>
>
> Ted
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 2:10 PM Deen, Glenn <Glenn_Deen=
> 40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> I get the sense from the proposed charter Media Metadata is currently
> treated sort of monolithically in terms of access to it, its
> encryptability, and its use in different workflows.  Metadata is quite rich
> as a part of the media delivery workflow and is getting increasingly
> important and extensive as media transport and media types evolve.  I
> propose that it needs more specific focus in the group.
>
>
>
> Metadata data and access to it is something that maybe should be
> considered a distinct type of media content on its own along with having
> distinct from the transported media authenticated access and encryption
> considerations that are independent of the media being transported.
>
>
>
> This could possibly be part of the “coordinated or cooperative” middle
> boxes that Lucas has mentioned in his not on the thread “Re: [Moq] "MoQ
> Architecture" question from Spencer's mail”
>
>
>
> Metadata should be more distinctly mentioned in the charter along with
> perhaps a couple of documents that specifically cover Metadata
> authentication and encryption and Metadata Use Cases by both end points and
> middle boxes.
>
>
>
> -glenn
>
> --
> Moq mailing list
> Moq@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!EqjB0ptNCUvf7xVMkakLbxPdk_Gx4kKd1I17Jbo4Lq6nWX6RncjNeI9A4VKBUT10uMHrJ2ZWirqKdVczWg$>
>
> --
> Moq mailing list
> Moq@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
>