[MORG] SPECIAL-USE + LIST-EXTENDED

Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> Wed, 04 January 2012 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tss@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: morg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A92321F8718 for <morg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 04:50:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zVOwOCpLSrQ9 for <morg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 04:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dovecot.org (dovecot.org [193.210.130.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044AE21F86BE for <morg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 04:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.10.2.201] (unknown [193.184.212.30]) by dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6F91AE87D9 for <morg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:50:01 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <1325681401.6987.78.camel@innu>
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
To: morg@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:50:01 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1-
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [MORG] SPECIAL-USE + LIST-EXTENDED
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:50:07 -0000

If we have a \Sent special-use mailbox:

a list (special-use) "" * return (special-use)
* LIST (\Sent) "/" "INBOX/Sent"
a OK List completed.

And we use RECURSIVEMATCH option, the result should be:

b list (special-use recursivematch) "" % return (special-use)
* LIST () "/" INBOX ("CHILDINFO" ("SPECIAL-USE"))
b OK List completed.

Right? This isn't explicitly mentioned in special-use RFC, but I guess
that's how RFC 5258 intended it to work.