Re: [MORG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6154 (5265)

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Mon, 26 February 2018 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: morg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E84C12D779 for <morg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 04:10:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQtx-jttc2fv for <morg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 04:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA47124234 for <morg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 04:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543ACFA0035; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:10:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1519647033; bh=PHUL28t5pFJ/AsUyw0LHgsKNWBeIfavWd3L4q2RNz40=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r4+dZh+1YsoCmTaHGmrDboio8i2AQo6XOJlUgZy2on+hTY7i7QFN3Knka25EP+IGR +W9NlvvgI5jxb2JK3GSpP9IF5NgZGk9Xxc2PcNA6LayCHFpso9ngMDqOy64mnjPzk/ bypVa9ozHj/Qutb1M2VlxKhqLl+8j7iHapNK9Iag=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1519647032-29839-31493/11/2; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:10:32 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: morg@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:10:31 +0000
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 1.0 (jessie)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <aadbd868-b9e2-4944-a02e-48fbbc007a42@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJK7hM4JufHPOvrUH=8Gx0Eh3f1rWdG5i-XjDpwgu8LkUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180225161655.11CA8B80C6A@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJK7hM4JufHPOvrUH=8Gx0Eh3f1rWdG5i-XjDpwgu8LkUA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/morg/Bx0K9tKGCoIOozSXhKc68Il_ToU>
Subject: Re: [MORG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6154 (5265)
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/morg/>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:10:38 -0000

Barry Leiba writes:
> That said, while this doesn't represent an error or omission in the
> spec, it certainly wouldn't have hurt to have been explicit about
> this.  So I also suggest that any work the Extra working group does
> related to IMAP takes an extra sentence here or there to be clear that
> the items it defines are case-insensitive, and that the case shown in
> the text is merely an editorial choice (perhaps just by explicitly
> saying "See the ABNF notes at the beginning of RFC 3501 Section 9.").

The problem here is that IMAP documents suffer from a moderate case of "do 
as I say, not as I do" syndrome. They say to treat flag names, keywords etc 
case insensitively, but the document authors treat those things case 
sensitively in the document.

There's a perfectly clear rule on page 81, and most of the 107 other pages 
are written as if the opposite rule were in force. That's not kind to the 
reader.

Arnt