Re: [MORG] draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-05 - WGLC

Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> Fri, 04 February 2011 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tss@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E470A3A69D5 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:40:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CjUhQdzQnZKE for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dovecot.org (dovecot.org [62.236.108.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A3A3A69CF for <morg@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.100.43] (a91-153-29-233.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.153.29.233]) by dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F94FA8AEE; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:43:24 +0200 (EET)
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik-ZPD3AYC386QzrxudTx8Uhs6xcea35rcbRuGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikk7E2+jp-1EO19=FeQ+4BgeEUSr1wU61cd7ZN1@mail.gmail.com> <BBB6C511-6543-4D2C-96C6-0BF0AFDFC966@iki.fi> <AANLkTinRmwLgxGA42XpZ4VZPO_FUjE+oGXc20cS5rY6E@mail.gmail.com> <1296843508.18488.360.camel@hurina> <AANLkTik-ZPD3AYC386QzrxudTx8Uhs6xcea35rcbRuGg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:43:23 +0200
Message-ID: <1296848603.18488.387.camel@hurina>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: morg <morg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MORG] draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-05 - WGLC
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:40:01 -0000

On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:12 -0500, Barry Leiba wrote:

> >>    S: * ESEARCH (TAG "tag1" MAILBOX "folder1" UIDVALIDITY 1) UID ALL
> >>    4001,4003,4005,4007,4009
> >>    S: * ESEARCH (TAG "tag2" MAILBOX "folder1" UIDVALIDITY 6789023554)
> >>    UID ALL 195001:195004,169788
> >
> > UIDVALIDITY changes rather suddenly in this example, so I think that's
> > just unnecessary confusion. Also the second one's UID set isn't sorted
> > as it should be.
> 
> The UIDVALIDITY change does seem odd.  Given the UID ranges, it seems
> intentional, but a little weird.  Alexey, did you have a particular
> reason for including an example like that, without textual
> explanation?

I think textual explanation at least would be good if it's left.

> The sequence set does not need to be sorted; why do you say "as it
> should be"?  According to RFC 3501, sorting it is a "MAY":

I thought they were supposed to be sorted in ESEARCH ALL. I even
verified it from the RFC, but looks like I just carelessly read what I
expected to read instead of what it really read. :) So forget about
this.