Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-list-specialuse-03.txt

Timo Sirainen <> Wed, 17 November 2010 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327073A68E0 for <>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:10:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w42OFFBcB4Dk for <>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8663A68CF for <>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ABEFA8A9B; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 03:10:30 +0200 (EET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Timo Sirainen <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:10:29 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
To: Barry Leiba <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Subject: Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-list-specialuse-03.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:10:32 -0000

On 17.11.2010, at 0.42, Barry Leiba wrote:

>>> Ah, good point. I think \Inbox and friends shouldn't be shown for
>>> INBOXes (etc.) of other users.
> I wonder when y'all last read this doc: \Inbox has been out for a while now.

I didn't even think about that.

> I'm not sure we want to restrict things, and forbid using a shared
> mailbox for some functions.  While I agree that in most cases you'll
> want to have all the special-use boxes in the user's private
> namespace, I'd rather keep any discussion of that as non-normative
> advice.
> What do you folks think of that suggestion?

I guess it's ok to have to have them in other namespaces, as long as the namespaces are how Mark intended them, meaning LIST "" * won't show such namespaces' contents.

>>> CREATE command "USE" parameter: In some server implementations, some
>>>    special uses may imply automatic action by the server.  For example,
>>>    creation of a "\Junk" mailbox might cause the server to start placing
>>>    messages that have been evaluated as spam into the mailbox.  Server
>>>    implementors SHOULD consider the consequences of allowing a user (or
>>>    client program) to designate the target of such automatic action.
>> Maybe make it clearer with a note something like: "(e.g. mailboxes
>> containing spaces, line feeds, quotes or '`' characters might break some
>> scripts)".
> Hm.  That's not what that security note is talking about at all.  I
> could certainly add your note as well (though I don't know that it's a
> security consideration), but it's entirely orthogonal to the paragraph
> you cited.

Oh. What possible consequences there could be then?