IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MORG] Review: draft-ietf-morg-fuzzy-search-02

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Sun, 01 August 2010 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B019A3A6784 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.26
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.26 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.295, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id riFdzIJuDFkz for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABB13A694C for <morg@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8332718C1A31F; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:58:28 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.mulberrymail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWOALcOthRNR; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:58:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-63f1.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [10.0.1.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F50918C1A318; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 14:58:25 +0200
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>, barryleiba@computer.org
Message-ID: <22FDB22B5203DF761DFD4F61@dhcp-63f1.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <C80B2463-5A2E-465D-A800-79EA009131AB@iki.fi>
References: <A199F09978CEADEC3697D0DA@dhcp-63f1.meeting.ietf.org> <AANLkTikpxj788+WaFstG_-9+Uu4rmuhzQSfFqUnR_psg@mail.gmail.com> <C80B2463-5A2E-465D-A800-79EA009131AB@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="616"
Cc: morg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MORG] Review: draft-ietf-morg-fuzzy-search-02
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:58:02 -0000

Hi Timo,

--On July 31, 2010 8:38:59 PM +0100 Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> wrote:

>> I'm not sure I like that requirement.  Maybe you have to use SORT if
>> you want that.  What happens in the general case of PARTIAL?  Might a
>> client that wants the *newest* 10 results be unhappy if it got the
>> OLDEST 10?
>
> Yes, I think SORT (RELEVANCY) should be required for that.  RFC 5267
> isn't super clear on if SORT supports PARTIAL, but I guess it should
> according to ABNF.

Can we get clarification on that? Even add an example to fuzzy search 
showing a client finding the top-10 relevant items.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email