Re: [MORG] draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-05 - WGLC

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 09 February 2011 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56ED3A6A07 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1BXq4UlhIai for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E3C3A687D for <morg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwc10 with SMTP id 10so655266iwc.31 for <morg@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:00:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=H3HMj1cvbFHPa4RZZxpPt1xcJSDMLtWCN0lhXvs/pk4=; b=XK6qbnKBX9qFvDuyBQOPhAKYq4+VbyhL5T27C7tlz+800jMB/HsGgs1vcjaMGXwAj1 Y05dPN8ESJmjhAPo0le/ZGU3QyZsZLSkinUoKg0RqK2ssBmbbWpwfmwuEXDj6Si75oJZ HSLMhSCBYJeEmGjLN4Hl+1hlSbsEiy74rLAsM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=mWV5B2P8YVd9P5gbkr/mqqhPAGNmt3LjfbL+KFXPdfWHxSP/WZH1eZ3tIsuT8QExL3 GGahMKD42jADb5Oas/UfZEAkDV81mm57MBtGyyYyxWMriFv7noRI4L61e1uYuzu8IW9j 4lxPc6Qd1yHnqwiLJ3Jf7rzhrFha4QoufjD/M=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.12.131 with SMTP id x3mr21442966ibx.76.1297288809130; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.34.13 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:00:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D530665.6000609@isode.com>
References: <AANLkTikk7E2+jp-1EO19=FeQ+4BgeEUSr1wU61cd7ZN1@mail.gmail.com> <BBB6C511-6543-4D2C-96C6-0BF0AFDFC966@iki.fi> <AANLkTinRmwLgxGA42XpZ4VZPO_FUjE+oGXc20cS5rY6E@mail.gmail.com> <1296843508.18488.360.camel@hurina> <4D530665.6000609@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:00:09 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: jidVxpHfPNmJAVzpv9MCf8ZanUE
Message-ID: <AANLkTimbgFuJpsr7=FY+URFMoQ0wDxxj58vSh2zP68Ya@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>, morg <morg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MORG] draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-05 - WGLC
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:59:59 -0000

>>>  S: * ESEARCH (TAG "tag1" MAILBOX "folder1" UIDVALIDITY 1) UID ALL
>>>  4001,4003,4005,4007,4009
>>>  S: * ESEARCH (TAG "tag2" MAILBOX "folder1" UIDVALIDITY 6789023554)
>>>  UID ALL 195001:195004,169788
>>
>> UIDVALIDITY changes rather suddenly in this example, so I think that's
>> just unnecessary confusion.
>
> Good point. Should be UIDVALIDITY 1 on the second quoted line as well.

And I think we should make the UIDs closer to the range in the first
line.  They don't HAVE to be, but the way it is seems a little odd.

Shall I submit the change and we say WGLC is done and we're ready to
send this up to the IESG?  Can we get a couple more reviews before we
do that?

Barry