Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-04.txt

"Georg C. F. Greve" <greve@kolabsys.com> Tue, 09 November 2010 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <greve@kolabsys.com>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA0B28C0F8 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:44:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29p+nsbpwiMV for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:44:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kolab.kolabsys.com (kolab.kolabsys.com [78.46.32.248]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF153A69EA for <morg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:44:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kolab.kolabsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B16420AA15A for <morg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:44:50 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kolabsys.com
Received: from kolab.kolabsys.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kolab.kolabsys.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SUN8YYIcDfac for <morg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:44:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kolab.kolabsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9492420AA16C for <morg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:44:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from katana.localnet (3.249-200-80.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [80.200.249.3]) (Authenticated sender: greve@kolabsys.com) by kolab.kolabsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F0820AA15A for <morg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:44:49 +0100 (CET)
From: "Georg C. F. Greve" <greve@kolabsys.com>
Organization: Kolab Systems AG
To: morg@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:44:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35.6-48.fc14.i686; KDE/4.5.2; i686; ; )
References: <20101109021529.26008.63016.idtracker@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20101109021529.26008.63016.idtracker@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2196730.JbH46OT8XX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201011090944.48230.greve@kolabsys.com>
Subject: Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-04.txt
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:44:29 -0000

Hi all,

This is the first time I'm actively participating, having joined this list not 
so long ago. So I apologize for questions that may seem stupid, or for things 
that may already have been discussed before I joined. In other words: I hope 
for your understanding and pointers in the right direction.

As to the multimailbox search, my question is whether the ANNOTATE Extension 
(http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc5257) has been taken into account?

As you know, we're providing a groupware solution that uses IMAP for its 
central information store, using annotations to identify special mail boxes 
for specific purposes, or configuration parameters.

So if it were possible to narrow the search by annotations and their specific 
values, it would be for instance possible to actually issue a search across 
all calendars that a user has access to.

Best regards,
Georg


-- 
Georg C. F. Greve
Chief Executive Officer

Kolab Systems AG
Zürich, Switzerland

e: greve@kolabsys.com
t: +41 78 904 43 33
w: http://kolabsys.com

pgp: 86574ACA Georg C. F. Greve