Re: [MORG] draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-05 - WGLC

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 10 February 2011 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FA53A6839 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5FGecKFNwoYq for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47083A67D2 for <morg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-185.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-185.cisco.com [64.101.72.185]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A9EB40393; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:06:06 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D546B3B.7040701@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:48:27 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <AANLkTikk7E2+jp-1EO19=FeQ+4BgeEUSr1wU61cd7ZN1@mail.gmail.com> <BBB6C511-6543-4D2C-96C6-0BF0AFDFC966@iki.fi> <AANLkTinRmwLgxGA42XpZ4VZPO_FUjE+oGXc20cS5rY6E@mail.gmail.com> <1296843508.18488.360.camel@hurina> <4D530665.6000609@isode.com> <AANLkTimbgFuJpsr7=FY+URFMoQ0wDxxj58vSh2zP68Ya@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimbgFuJpsr7=FY+URFMoQ0wDxxj58vSh2zP68Ya@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090700000108070905020509"
Cc: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>, morg <morg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MORG] draft-ietf-morg-multimailbox-search-05 - WGLC
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:48:18 -0000

On 2/9/11 3:00 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>>>  S: * ESEARCH (TAG "tag1" MAILBOX "folder1" UIDVALIDITY 1) UID ALL
>>>>  4001,4003,4005,4007,4009
>>>>  S: * ESEARCH (TAG "tag2" MAILBOX "folder1" UIDVALIDITY 6789023554)
>>>>  UID ALL 195001:195004,169788
>>>
>>> UIDVALIDITY changes rather suddenly in this example, so I think that's
>>> just unnecessary confusion.
>>
>> Good point. Should be UIDVALIDITY 1 on the second quoted line as well.
> 
> And I think we should make the UIDs closer to the range in the first
> line.  They don't HAVE to be, but the way it is seems a little odd.
> 
> Shall I submit the change and we say WGLC is done and we're ready to
> send this up to the IESG?  Can we get a couple more reviews before we
> do that?

Sounds good to me. I've just changed the state to "revised I-D needed"
in the tracker. Once a new version magically appears, I'll request IETF
Last Call.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/