Re: [MORG] Review: draft-ietf-morg-fuzzy-search-02

Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> Tue, 16 November 2010 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tss@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39DA3A6DE6 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:52:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06dXX+EOwScK for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:52:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dovecot.org (dovecot.org [62.236.108.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B373A6DDD for <morg@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:52:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.134.132.83] (unknown [194.65.5.235]) by dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D2DFA8AF4; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:52:49 +0200 (EET)
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
In-Reply-To: <22FDB22B5203DF761DFD4F61@dhcp-63f1.meeting.ietf.org>
References: <A199F09978CEADEC3697D0DA@dhcp-63f1.meeting.ietf.org> <AANLkTikpxj788+WaFstG_-9+Uu4rmuhzQSfFqUnR_psg@mail.gmail.com> <C80B2463-5A2E-465D-A800-79EA009131AB@iki.fi> <22FDB22B5203DF761DFD4F61@dhcp-63f1.meeting.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:52:48 +0000
Message-ID: <1289922768.1764.168.camel@kurkku.sapo.corppt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: morg@ietf.org, dave.cridland@isode.com
Subject: Re: [MORG] Review: draft-ietf-morg-fuzzy-search-02
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:52:10 -0000

On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 14:58 +0200, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> > Yes, I think SORT (RELEVANCY) should be required for that.  RFC 5267
> > isn't super clear on if SORT supports PARTIAL, but I guess it should
> > according to ABNF.
> 
> Can we get clarification on that? Even add an example to fuzzy search 
> showing a client finding the top-10 relevant items.

In my understanding it does, and Dovecot supports it, but I don't know
if Dave or other implementers were thinking the same.. Dave?

I was planning on using this example:

C: D02 SORT RETURN (PARTIAL 1:10) (RELEVANCY) UTF-8 FUZZY TEXT "World"
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "D02") PARTIAL (1:10 19,80,85:86,95,102:103,111,113:114)
S: D02 OK Sort completed.