IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?

"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Tue, 02 December 2008 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-interop-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-interop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734DE3A6AF8; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:37:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9393A6BE0 for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:37:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m2OLKDlGSSIa for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:37:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [217.115.75.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966F33A6AF8 for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mB29b9RP000942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:37:10 +0100
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mB29b9Wu028121; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:37:09 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.57]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:37:08 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C95461.8B5771E1"
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:36:59 +0100
Message-ID: <43284B5A95E36B4AB4A91EBA4E0FC31EFE0B70@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <5D6BC3F282284834A176BD399603BD23@your029b8cecfe>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?
Thread-Index: AclUX0GU08L0XtjcRbebnmVsK88glAAAeXsg
References: <A79C9B7D57B940FF802C8395F15E232E@your029b8cecfe> <C55A12D2.EB1D%benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com> <43284B5A95E36B4AB4A91EBA4E0FC31EFE09F2@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net> <4934FCC2.7030305@chello.nl> <5D6BC3F282284834A176BD399603BD23@your029b8cecfe>
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2008 09:37:08.0680 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B8FFC80:01C95461]
Cc: "Weingarten, Yaacov \(NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon\)" <yaacov.weingarten@nsn.com>, mpls-interop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?
X-BeenThere: mpls-interop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF MPLS Interoperability Design Team <mpls-interop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls-interop>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-interop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,
I agree that we need to find a better name......
What about the figure in the second slide of the attached?
If multiple LSPs transmit via the same physical path in the first domain
and have the same constraints, why cannot we aggregate them and run OAM
per the aggregated in the first domain?
Best regards,
Nurit

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:20
To: hhelvoort@chello.nl; Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
Cc: ext Ben Niven-Jenkins; mpls-interop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?

Hi Huub.

> The TC aggregate is not a TC anymore, it should IMHO be referred
> to as a tunnel.

Yes!

Which is not to say that it is not a useful construct for reducing OAM 
overhead.

I think (OK, I know) that I suggested we avoid using the TC language as
I 
thought we would find it unhelpful. Perhaps when we meet to go through
this, 
we can draw pictures and work out the language later?

A 



_______________________________________________
Mpls-interop mailing list
Mpls-interop@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email