[Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 30 December 2008 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-interop-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-interop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946C83A6967;
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:25:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424D23A6A3B
for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:25:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.767
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.767 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.583, BAYES_40=-0.185, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id yVFmWiLW3W-2 for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC24C3A6A13
for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
mBUHP5Al009436
for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:25:05 GMT
Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com
[81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0)
by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
mBUHP4KU009423
for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:25:04 GMT
Message-ID: <5C522985610A43179A66F564F4612749@your029b8cecfe>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <mpls-interop@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:24:56 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection
X-BeenThere: mpls-interop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: IETF MPLS Interoperability Design Team <mpls-interop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>,
<mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls-interop>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-interop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>,
<mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, Is anyone familiar with Q9/15's work on Generic Protection Schemes in G.808 etc.? Does anyone know whether the ITU-T has any expectations about their work with regard to MPLS-TP? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ Mpls-interop mailing list Mpls-interop@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop
- [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection hejia
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Malcolm Betts
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Drake, John E
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Malcolm Betts
- Re: [Mpls-interop] ITU-T work on protection Malcolm Betts