IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Mpls-interop] PST.ppt

"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Wed, 03 December 2008 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-interop-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-interop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3866E3A6861; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:35:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF1628C11F for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:35:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVoxrW8+C0l4 for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:35:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [217.115.75.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB993A6861 for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:35:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mB3CZYWq004360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:35:34 +0100
Received: from demuexc024.nsn-intra.net (demuexc024.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.11]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mB3CZYKa015049; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:35:34 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.57]) by demuexc024.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:35:33 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C95543.A20EF50A"
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:35:20 +0100
Message-ID: <43284B5A95E36B4AB4A91EBA4E0FC31E01010A6F@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: PST.ppt
Thread-Index: AclVQ5qNH3yd3on1QfK55Wy+9P61Nw==
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2008 12:35:33.0370 (UTC) FILETIME=[A277CDA0:01C95543]
Cc: mpls-interop@ietf.org, "Weingarten, Yaacov \(NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon\)" <yaacov.weingarten@nsn.com>
Subject: [Mpls-interop] PST.ppt
X-BeenThere: mpls-interop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF MPLS Interoperability Design Team <mpls-interop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls-interop>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-interop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org

Oops......my mistake.......here is the updated figure......

The intention was to refer to a SS-PW. Accidentally I referred to T-PE
and S-PE. 

We can provide also another figure for the MS-PW case.

Note also that the figure is adapted with the new term - PST

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 14:21
To: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
Cc: Adrian Farrel; hhelvoort@chello.nl; Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod
HaSharon); mpls-interop@ietf.org
Subject: PST question: Was (Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?)

 

Renaming the thread - a little late but anyway ...

 

at risk asking the obvious, since I'm still reading through the

thread?

 

 

 

Nurit,

 

In your figure will the S-PEs label swap the label on

E2E tunnels LSP? Or is the same label showing up at the

second T-PE?

 

/Loa

 

Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) wrote:

> Hi,

> I agree that we need to find a better name......

> What about the figure in the second slide of the attached?

> If multiple LSPs transmit via the same physical path in the first
domain

> and have the same constraints, why cannot we aggregate them and run
OAM

> per the aggregated in the first domain?

> Best regards,

> Nurit

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: ext Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] 

> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:20

> To: hhelvoort@chello.nl; Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)

> Cc: ext Ben Niven-Jenkins; mpls-interop@ietf.org

> Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?

> 

> Hi Huub.

> 

>> The TC aggregate is not a TC anymore, it should IMHO be referred

>> to as a tunnel.

> 

> Yes!

> 

> Which is not to say that it is not a useful construct for reducing OAM


> overhead.

> 

> I think (OK, I know) that I suggested we avoid using the TC language
as

> I 

> thought we would find it unhelpful. Perhaps when we meet to go through

> this, 

> we can draw pictures and work out the language later?

> 

> A 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Mpls-interop mailing list

> Mpls-interop@ietf.org

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop

 

 

-- 

 

 

Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@redback.com

Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu

Redback Networks                      phone: +46 8 632 77 14

An Ericsson Company

 


_______________________________________________
Mpls-interop mailing list
Mpls-interop@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email