Re: [Mpls-interop] mpls-tp document flow chart

Loa,

I suspect there should be a difference between "ITU-T ad hoc" input and 
"ITU-T" review.

In early stages of drafting, we might ask for input from the ITU-T ad hoc 
group.

But when we ask for a formal review, we are asking the ITU-T. How the ITU-T 
decides to handle this review (for example, on the ad hoc group's mailing 
list, on a particular Question's mail exploder, or at a face-to-face 
meeting) is not our concern.

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>
To: "MEAD team" <mpls-interop@ietf.org>rg>; "Malcolm Betts" 
<betts01@nortel.com>om>; "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com>om>; "Olaf M. 
Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 3:31 PM
Subject: [Mpls-interop] mpls-tp document flow chart - first iteration

> All,
>
> In geneva Malcolm and I promised to come up with a mpls-tp document
> flow chart as a reference for SG15.
>
> This is how I think things should work, but as always comments are
> welcome.
>
> I looks a bit complicated, but it all comes down to that we keep
> SG15 as informed as possible.
>
> /Loa
>
> -- 
>
>
> Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@redback.com
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> Redback Networks                      phone: +46 8 632 77 14
> An Ericsson Company
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> _______________________________________________
> Mpls-interop mailing list
> Mpls-interop@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop
> 

_______________________________________________
Mpls-interop mailing list
Mpls-interop@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop

Re: [Mpls-interop] mpls-tp document flow chart - first iteration