Re: [Mpls-interop] MPLS-TP OAM requirements - Lockandnotificationof lock

["Lam, Hing-Kam \(Kam\)" <[e-mail]>]

Notification across layers takes place within a node. This is the
context that my email was responding to.

In a separate email from Malcolm, he mentioned "just notify the far end
that the lock is in place and allow the decision ..." This is not what
my email was responding to.

I hope I understand your first question correctly.

Regards,
Kam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 6:02 AM
> To: Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] MPLS-TP OAM requirements -
> Lockandnotificationof lock
> 
> Am I missing something?
> Does notification across layers take place within a node or on the
wire?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <[e-mail]>
> To: "Malcolm Betts" <[e-mail]>; "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN -
IL/Hod
> HaSharon)" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>;
> <[e-mail]>; "Martin Vigoureux"
> <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 6:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] MPLS-TP OAM requirements -
> Lockandnotificationof
> lock
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> See inline below. I am addressing the issue of notification across
> layers, not addressing notifying the sink (egress) points.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kam
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > On Behalf Of Malcolm Betts
> > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 8:42 AM
> > To: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]
> > Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] MPLS-TP OAM requirements - Lock
> > andnotificationof lock
> >
> > All,
> > I think you are making this far too complicated...  I see no need to
> > propagate the locked indication across layers.
> >
> > [Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)] The bottom line is to avoid unexpected
> > interruption to the client services so that to reduce unnecessary
alarm
> > being raised from the client layer.
>