Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?
"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Mon, 01 December 2008 23:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-interop-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-interop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909153A67FD;
Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B221A3A697B
for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-1.428, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id tfnxDJ6FAvfy for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net
[217.115.75.234])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912B33A67FD
for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56])
by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
mB1NxMCY031009
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:59:22 +0100
Received: from demuexc024.nsn-intra.net (demuexc024.nsn-intra.net
[10.159.32.11])
by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id mB1NxM1B029807; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:59:22 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.57]) by
demuexc024.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:59:22 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:59:14 +0100
Message-ID: <43284B5A95E36B4AB4A91EBA4E0FC31EFE09F3@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <43284B5A95E36B4AB4A91EBA4E0FC31EFE09F2@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?
Thread-Index: AclUAoG79k/wUVEUG0iikr7nxmko1wADARlgAACL2RA=
References: <A79C9B7D57B940FF802C8395F15E232E@your029b8cecfe>
<C55A12D2.EB1D%benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com>
<43284B5A95E36B4AB4A91EBA4E0FC31EFE09F2@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>,
"ext Ben Niven-Jenkins" <benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com>,
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <mpls-interop@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2008 23:59:22.0093 (UTC)
FILETIME=[D4AA99D0:01C95410]
Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?
X-BeenThere: mpls-interop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF MPLS Interoperability Design Team <mpls-interop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>,
<mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls-interop>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-interop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>,
<mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org
BTW, isn't it (TC/lsp-hierarchy) the same principle as we have in GMPLS segment protection? -----Original Message----- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 01:46 To: ext Ben Niven-Jenkins; Adrian Farrel; mpls-interop@ietf.org Cc: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) Subject: RE: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Hi Ben Scalability of TC (or whatever we call it) is basically if you have 1:1 mapping between TC and LSP. But if you have 1:n mapping TC and many LSPs the main concern can be solved. If you define TC in reasonable areas (e.g. across a domain in a multi-domain network) and the TC aggregate multiple LSPs then IMO the construction of TC is the cleanest one and works well with OAM and with protection. Best regards, Nurit -----Original Message----- From: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Ben Niven-Jenkins Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 00:17 To: Adrian Farrel; mpls-interop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian, On 27/11/2008 22:27, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > I ended up with a modest list of MPLS-TP design team folk willing to > squander their evenings in Geneva working on drafts. Must be that the Swiss > night life is too exciting! Or that there is no Q.Whisky in SG15 ;-) > Lastly, I would like to see if I can understand the issues with the OAM > techniques proposed. Can we continue to use TTL? Does the idea of using > nesting for all OAM segments really hold up? Is the OAM cart in danger of > driving the protection hobbyhorse (pardon my mixed metaphore). I'm no OAM expert (I leave that to Tom :-) ) but I am yet to be convinced by nesting all OAM segments for the reason that it sounds complicated and that means to me that it will be expensive to run and to scale. It also sounds like I'd have to have my network constructed in a particular way to be able to use OAM which means even in the best run network I will at some point not be able to run OAM when I need it (and the customer is screaming at me) because the network wasn't constructed correctly (either by design or actual configuration != design). Ben _______________________________________________ Mpls-interop mailing list Mpls-interop@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop _______________________________________________ Mpls-interop mailing list Mpls-interop@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop
- [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Loa Andersson
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? BUSI ITALO
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Eric Gray
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? BUSI ITALO
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Loa Andersson
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Ben Niven-Jenkins
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? BOCCI Matthew
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Drake, John E
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? julien.meuric
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Loa Andersson
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Drake, John E
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Drake, John E
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? BUSI ITALO
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? BUSI ITALO
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? BUSI ITALO
- [Mpls-interop] PST question: Was (Re: Who will be… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva? Adrian Farrel