IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 02 December 2008 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-interop-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-interop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4713A6AC5; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:20:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631A33A6BE3 for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:20:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uK20HM6kxz1b for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:20:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from protext01.itu.ch (protext01.itu.ch [156.106.192.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9E33A6AF6 for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:20:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from protext01.itu.ch ([156.106.192.41]) by protext01.itu.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:20:40 +0100
Received: From mail6.itu.ch ([156.106.192.22]) by protext01.itu.ch (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) id 1228209639781; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:20:39 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([156.106.216.176]) by mail6.itu.ch (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB29KZEc367821; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:20:38 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <5D6BC3F282284834A176BD399603BD23@your029b8cecfe>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <hhelvoort@chello.nl>, "Sprecher, Nurit \(NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon\)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
References: <A79C9B7D57B940FF802C8395F15E232E@your029b8cecfe> <C55A12D2.EB1D%benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com> <43284B5A95E36B4AB4A91EBA4E0FC31EFE09F2@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net> <4934FCC2.7030305@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:20:12 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail6.itu.ch [156.106.192.22]); Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:20:39 +0100 (MET)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2008 09:20:40.0406 (UTC) FILETIME=[3E815760:01C9545F]
Cc: mpls-interop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] Who will be in Geneva?
X-BeenThere: mpls-interop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: IETF MPLS Interoperability Design Team <mpls-interop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls-interop>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-interop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-interop-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Huub.

> The TC aggregate is not a TC anymore, it should IMHO be referred
> to as a tunnel.

Yes!

Which is not to say that it is not a useful construct for reducing OAM 
overhead.

I think (OK, I know) that I suggested we avoid using the TC language as I 
thought we would find it unhelpful. Perhaps when we meet to go through this, 
we can draw pictures and work out the language later?

A 


_______________________________________________
Mpls-interop mailing list
Mpls-interop@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email