Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv

Nischal Sheth <nsheth@juniper.net> Mon, 09 July 2012 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <nsheth@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4675921F875E for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHfKMF6s9Z6f for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com (exprod7og124.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1AE21F875D for <mpls-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT/tsBK1XIwUml/RF/4GCfqUiLPxgw8qV@postini.com; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:41:01 PDT
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:40:06 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nsheth-t410.jnpr.net [172.17.21.161]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id q69Ne2h70965; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsheth@juniper.net)
Message-ID: <4FFB6BCC.5030006@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:39:56 -0700
From: Nischal Sheth <nsheth@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
References: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C7120F21D3@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C7120F21D3@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:48:11 -0700
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, "mpls-review@ietf.org" <mpls-review@ietf.org>, Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>, "Sami Boutros \(sboutros\)" <sboutros@cisco.com>, "skraza@cisco.com" <skraza@cisco.com>, Nic Leymann <N.Leymann@telekom.de>, "thomas.morin@orange.com" <thomas.morin@orange.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Subject: Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv
X-BeenThere: mpls-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS Review <mpls-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-review>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 23:40:36 -0000

Hi All,

Having read and reviewed draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02,
I think it is well-written and addresses a practical problem encountered
in LDP deployments. I believe it's ready for adoption as a WG document.

I agree with previous comments that new LDP applications MUST state the
applicability of the negotiated label advertisement discipline.

-Nischal

On 6/20/2012 7:14 AM, Ross Callon wrote:
> You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
> draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.
> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
> (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
> the document technically sound? We are interested in knowing whether the
> document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn’t have to
> be perfect at this point, but should be a good start).
> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and secretary,
> and CC’d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent
> privately to only the WG chairs.
> Are you able to review this draft by July 11, 2012 (this is giving you an
> extra week due to the July 4th holiday)?
> Thanks, Ross
> (as MPLS WG chair)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mpls-review mailing list
> Mpls-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review