[Mpls-review] FW: MPLS Review of draft-napierala-mpls-targeted-mldp

[Ross Callon <[e-mail]>]

FYI.

Ross

From: Vero Zheng [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 3:44 AM
To: Ross Callon; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: George Swallow; Loa Andersson; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: MPLS Review of draft-napierala-mpls-targeted-mldp

Review of draft-napierala-mpls-targeted-mldp:

This draft basically extent the mLDP over Target LDP Session. According to this draft, the Upstream LSR could either be a BGP next-hop or a RSVP-TE tunnel endpoint. No protocol extension needed.
I feel this is useful in operation networks, where not all the LDP neighbors are directly connected or the mLDP is partially deployed in the networks.

I think this draft is ready to be considered for WG adoption.

BR,
Vero

From: Ross Callon [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:59 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Vero Zheng
Cc: Ross Callon; George Swallow; Loa Andersson; [e-mail]
Subject: MPLS Review of draft-napierala-mpls-targeted-mldp

You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for draft-napierala-mpls-targeted-mldp.

Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
(ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
the document technically sound?  We are interested in knowing whether the
document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn't have to be
perfect at this point, but should be a good start).

Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and secretary, and CC'd to the
MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent privately to only the WG chairs.

Are you able to review this draft by May 23, 2012?

Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS WG chair)

PS: Note that this is a new experiment. We have not yet figured out whether reviewers should coordinate and send one combined review, or if they should each send their individual reviews.