[Mpls-review] Volunteers needed, draft-zheng-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth
Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Fri, 01 June 2012 03:38 UTC
Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2A711E8086 for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.938
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.938 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.660, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0kEr5SmBiDA for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8584A11E8072 for <mpls-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT8g5RQoXfFB1rMsE6ge1UthN2mr6EpDG@postini.com; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:38:45 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:34:35 -0700
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by p-cldfe01-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:34:35 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Thu, 31 May 2012 23:34:34 -0400
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: "mpls-review@ietf.org" <mpls-review@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 23:34:31 -0400
Thread-Topic: Volunteers needed, draft-zheng-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth
Thread-Index: Ac0/p3SPVoIgEfKaRFuyheeEdSuwww==
Message-ID: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70FDAE1DD@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-puzzleid: {92A5FBB4-5A80-4E3E-A1B5-3EFB1A27D292}
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: An8C At+/ BOqf CS4j CgrQ Fae+ F5+H GIIH GKNt Ghef G+Ny HVP/ Hqm8 H6GD H8gg I7l4; 1; bQBwAGwAcwAtAHIAZQB2AGkAZQB3AEAAaQBlAHQAZgAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {92A5FBB4-5A80-4E3E-A1B5-3EFB1A27D292}; cgBjAGEAbABsAG8AbgBAAGoAdQBuAGkAcABlAHIALgBuAGUAdAA=; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:34:31 GMT; VgBvAGwAdQBuAHQAZQBlAHIAcwAgAG4AZQBlAGQAZQBkACwAIABkAHIAYQBmAHQALQB6AGgAZQBuAGcALQBtAHAAbABzAC0AbABkAHAALQBoAGUAbABsAG8ALQBjAHIAeQBwAHQAbwAtAGEAdQB0AGgA
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70FDAE1DDEMBX01WFjnprn_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Mpls-review] Volunteers needed, draft-zheng-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth
X-BeenThere: mpls-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS Review <mpls-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-review>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:38:46 -0000
We need a small number (1 to 3) volunteers to review draft-zheng-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth. The reason that we are asking for volunteers is that in order to review this properly, a reviewer needs to have a least a bit of knowledge of cryptographic authentication. Of course the document uses authentication algorithms defined by others, but a reviewer would need to know enough to at least be able to make sure that the right information is included in the TLV that this document defines, and that the references cryptographic algorithms are the right ones (or at least a good start, since more could be added during the normal WG process). Thus, can we have a small number of volunteers who know enough to take a look at this? Thanks, Ross (for the MPLS WG chairs)