Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv

Yaacov Weingarten <wyaacov@gmail.com> Mon, 02 July 2012 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wyaacov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CC321F869C for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_AVOID=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5aJyL7ioMoIg for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f51.google.com (mail-qa0-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8910F21F8623 for <mpls-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qaea16 with SMTP id a16so1891712qae.10 for <mpls-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3yNCVkhU2IlJDD9JTVWJwwpcdUO5lDiznmV2/kfZFfo=; b=MnTMyiUVPJ28qX+vas3dxdux0WENyJzHTzaKZ5x5PTdmpab1a8+JcLokS7CZCEKKx5 kEgDnoHn3uB13uJJ93cI1PsCAcg9g94gDSOp6P+MHWzImTB6+p7hjhL3OEC924RAnhZ6 hvkx+g4QCVAfoJSTYN95y16x71sRHx+ZMRQOFAJAxiZay9g7mclcHYGBrjueu4ydjyTw /J8DE21Htwvd4Xd6my51bhGUm3Qix6n/0e/hg1ponZR1VmjkI52rNC96cnPublk2ZgLT xCea0xyvnLgL6npJcEcJBMo4tqHvM50qRsog9NMCpTF/E0rb3MQ56QYqSAOa6R5dMdpM 2vyA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.137.67 with SMTP id v3mr6785629qct.51.1341239775352; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.17.140 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C7120F21D3@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C7120F21D3@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:36:15 +0300
Message-ID: <CAM0WBXWHjaaX76kvE8Dk2+O1mjgbxEomrUgmY=+V+xtX4+aaaw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yaacov Weingarten <wyaacov@gmail.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023545303b85e596a04c3d9b80d
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:31:51 -0700
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, Nischal Sheth <nsheth@juniper.net>, "mpls-review@ietf.org" <mpls-review@ietf.org>, Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>, "Sami Boutros \(sboutros\)" <sboutros@cisco.com>, "skraza@cisco.com" <skraza@cisco.com>, Nic Leymann <N.Leymann@telekom.de>, "thomas.morin@orange.com" <thomas.morin@orange.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Subject: Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv
X-BeenThere: mpls-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS Review <mpls-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-review>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:36:11 -0000

Hi, all

I have read the draft and in general would say that it is coherent, useful,
fills a void, and ready for WG adoption.

There is one point that I would raise with the authors and their extensions
to RFC5036 Section 3.5.3 - I think it would be helpful if the authors
explicitly addressed the final sentence in the description of the A bit and
explained how to support an LSR that the mode that is being forced on it is
"unacceptable".  During the Initialization of the session there is a
possibility for the LSR to reject the session, but in the proposal, it
seems that a particular application may use a mode that was not agreed as
part of the initialization.

Aside from that there are several editorial corrections that should be
performed that I will forward to the authors

BR,
yaacov weingarten

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:

>  You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
> draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.
>
> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
> (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
> the document technically sound?  We are interested in knowing whether the
> document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn’t have to
> be perfect at this point, but should be a good start).
>
> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and secretary,
> and CC’d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent
> privately to only the WG chairs.
>
> Are you able to review this draft by July 11, 2012 (this is giving you an
> extra week due to the July 4th holiday)?
>
> Thanks, Ross
> (as MPLS WG chair)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mpls-review mailing list
> Mpls-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review
>
>