Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv

Hi, all

I have read the draft and in general would say that it is coherent, useful,
fills a void, and ready for WG adoption.

There is one point that I would raise with the authors and their extensions
to RFC5036 Section 3.5.3 - I think it would be helpful if the authors
explicitly addressed the final sentence in the description of the A bit and
explained how to support an LSR that the mode that is being forced on it is
"unacceptable".  During the Initialization of the session there is a
possibility for the LSR to reject the session, but in the proposal, it
seems that a particular application may use a mode that was not agreed as
part of the initialization.

Aside from that there are several editorial corrections that should be
performed that I will forward to the authors

BR,
yaacov weingarten

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:

>  You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
> draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.
>
> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
> (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
> the document technically sound?  We are interested in knowing whether the
> document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn’t have to
> be perfect at this point, but should be a good start).
>
> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and secretary,
> and CC’d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent
> privately to only the WG chairs.
>
> Are you able to review this draft by July 11, 2012 (this is giving you an
> extra week due to the July 4th holiday)?
>
> Thanks, Ross
> (as MPLS WG chair)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mpls-review mailing list
> Mpls-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review
>
>