Re: [Mpls-review] Expertise for MPLS Reviewers

Ross, hi

I am willing to review documents connected with MPLS-TP, Protection for
MPLS-TP, Any OAM.

Hope this helps,
yaacov

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:

> MPLS reviewers;****
>
> ** **
>
> In order to facilitate assignment of reviews to reviewers, we would like
> some indication regarding what topics each of you are comfortable
> reviewing. It seems too complex to interpret a rambling paragraph from each
> of you describing in general terms what you know. Instead, it will be much
> easier for us to administer if we have a list of general technical
> categories, and a list from each of you regarding which technical
> categories you are familiar with. ****
>
> ** **
>
> With this in mind, please let us know which of the technical categories
> listed below are ones for which you feel comfortable reviewing documents.
> If we have left something out, then feel free to add a category or two if
> need be. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks, Ross****
>
> ** **
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------***
> *
>
> Technical Categories
>
>     LDP
>     mLDP
>     RSVP-TE
>     P2MP RSVP-TE
>     MPLS-TP
>     Protection Mechanisms for:
>         LDP
>         mLDP
>         RSVP-TE
>         P2MP RSVP-TE
>         MPLS-TP
>     LSP Ping
>     BFD and other Fault OAM
>     Performance OAM
>     Security
>     MIBs
>
> Other Categories
>
>     Document quality and organization
>     Terminology
>     Protocol completeness
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mpls-review mailing list
> Mpls-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review
>
>