[Mpls-review] Expertise for MPLS Reviewers

Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Fri, 01 June 2012 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0614411E80F3 for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.108
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.490, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mR+tOpChFWYz for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og121.obsmtp.com (exprod7og121.obsmtp.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9393411E80E0 for <mpls-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob121.postini.com ([]) with SMTP ID DSNKT8jVeHPTW5on+HTN90ubkAN0Llj9H+wG@postini.com; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 07:45:18 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net ( by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:43:55 -0700
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ( by p-cldfe01-hq.jnpr.net ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:43:55 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:43:54 -0400
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: "mpls-review@ietf.org" <mpls-review@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:43:53 -0400
Thread-Topic: Expertise for MPLS Reviewers
Thread-Index: Ac0tiZGa6EM1tcB/Q9CVuOxPzQRX0ABaIYLgACasOcUAAlb18AQagf7A
Message-ID: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70FE8EF01@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70FE8EF01EMBX01WFjnprn_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN \(MARTIN\)" <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Subject: [Mpls-review] Expertise for MPLS Reviewers
X-BeenThere: mpls-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS Review <mpls-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-review>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:45:20 -0000

MPLS reviewers;

In order to facilitate assignment of reviews to reviewers, we would like some indication regarding what topics each of you are comfortable reviewing. It seems too complex to interpret a rambling paragraph from each of you describing in general terms what you know. Instead, it will be much easier for us to administer if we have a list of general technical categories, and a list from each of you regarding which technical categories you are familiar with.

With this in mind, please let us know which of the technical categories listed below are ones for which you feel comfortable reviewing documents. If we have left something out, then feel free to add a category or two if need be.

Thanks, Ross

Technical Categories

    Protection Mechanisms for:
        P2MP RSVP-TE
    LSP Ping
    BFD and other Fault OAM
    Performance OAM

Other Categories

    Document quality and organization
    Protocol completeness