[Mpls-review] MPLS Review Team Members, and a thought
Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Thu, 14 June 2012 17:15 UTC
Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDFE21F8669 for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.388, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u7-iAg-GMO7i for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (exprod7og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CCA21F854E for <mpls-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT9ocOHZBOlVsRh2rE3M6LsEbaIEwTm76@postini.com; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:15:37 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:14:30 -0700
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by p-cldfe02-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:14:30 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:14:29 -0400
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: "mpls-review@ietf.org" <mpls-review@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:14:25 -0400
Thread-Topic: MPLS Review Team Members, and a thought
Thread-Index: Ac1KT5uZZmvHi7kgQBCIQn0/cblLXQAAGwHw
Message-ID: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C7117E4964@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-puzzleid: {463C7F0D-64DA-4D80-9D40-D7825B60869B}
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: HKw= BhOE FDgH Fpf8 GS3S GbeF G8JN HHiO HMqp IIJX Iq9e I4mJ JKzw J4p+ KZCu K1Hg; 1; bQBwAGwAcwAtAHIAZQB2AGkAZQB3AEAAaQBlAHQAZgAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {463C7F0D-64DA-4D80-9D40-D7825B60869B}; cgBjAGEAbABsAG8AbgBAAGoAdQBuAGkAcABlAHIALgBuAGUAdAA=; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:14:25 GMT; TQBQAEwAUwAgAFIAZQB2AGkAZQB3ACAAVABlAGEAbQAgAE0AZQBtAGIAZQByAHMALAAgAGEAbgBkACAAYQAgAHQAaABvAHUAZwBoAHQA
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Mpls-review] MPLS Review Team Members, and a thought
X-BeenThere: mpls-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS Review <mpls-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-review>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:15:38 -0000
We are thinking that requests for MPLS Review team members to review documents should be CC'd to the MPLS WG list. It would also seem that the requests should be seen by the full review team. However, I am thinking that all of you are on the MPLS WG email list, and that you don't need two copies of each email. Therefore my thought is to send the requests to the people who are being asked to review the document, and CC the MPLS list, but not separately CC the review team.
A few people who are on the MPLS Review team has asked "Who is on the team". This seems like information that should be public -- which implies that at least as long as this experiment is continued past the Vancouver IETF, then we should send the full list to the MPLS list. For now I figured that I would let each of the review team members know who else is on the team. Let me know if you object to the information being fully public.
This is the list of people who have accepted. Several others were invited but either declined or never responded. Note that Loa, George, Adrian, Martin, and myself are not actually on the review team, but need to be on the email list so that we know what is going on. Where specific expertise is needed we might on occasion ping people not on this list to get them to help us.
Thanks, Ross
mach.chen@huawei.com
jcucchiara@mindspring.com
eosborne@cisco.com
mjork@juniper.net
lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn
gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com
tnadeau@juniper.net
kenji.fujihira.dj@hitachi.com
rcallon@juniper.net
adrian@olddog.co.uk
jeremy.whittaker@verizon.com
thomas.beckhaus@telekom.de
martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com
loa@pi.nu
swallow@cisco.com
daniel@olddog.co.uk
skraza@cisco.com
thomas.morin@orange.com
bertietf@bwijnen.net
sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com
rtorvi@juniper.net
nsheth@juniper.net
david.i.allan@ericsson.com
wu.bo@zte.com.cn
n.leymann@telekom.de
wyaacov@gmail.com
hejia@huawei.com
eric.gray@ericsson.com
vero.zheng@huawei.com
nick.delregno@verizon.com