Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
"Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <eosborne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 951DE28C0CE; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:56:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUUIfo-lGgs2;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:56:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECB128C13E;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com;
dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An8CAMdC90ytJXG+/2dsb2JhbACUUY5QcadMmw4ChUUEhF5VhEKECA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,288,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="188391901"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by
rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2010 14:58:10 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com [72.163.62.138])
by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB2EwAUR025571;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:58:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-202.cisco.com ([72.163.62.209]) by
xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:57:50 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:57:48 -0600
Message-ID: <D29E470202D67745B61059870F433B5403A8A3BD@XMB-RCD-202.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C549DE0E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3]
[AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcuSIsOuufii+EmrRR6zdRegAAiNTAAAEK3wAALYf+AAAHu9IAAAIrJw
References: <D29E470202D67745B61059870F433B5403A8A38E@XMB-RCD-202.cisco.com>
<5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C549DE0E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com>
To: "John E Drake" <jdrake@juniper.net>, "LEVRAU,
LIEVEN (LIEVEN)" <lieven.levrau@alcatel-lucent.com>,
"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>,
"Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2010 14:57:50.0106 (UTC)
FILETIME=[49E617A0:01CB9231]
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, pwe3@ietf.org,
mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3]
[AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:56:57 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: John E Drake [mailto:jdrake@juniper.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 9:53 AM > To: Eric Osborne (eosborne); LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN); Rajiv Asati > (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team; pwe3@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollondraft-he-mpls- > tp-csf-03.txt > > As I understand it, the server at one end of an LSP detects that its > client has failed and it uses CSF to tell the server at the other end of > the LSP. Presumably that server then tells its client. > Yup. And I go back to my earlier point - there are three things we know how to transport over MPLS: MPLS, IP, and pseudowires. Pseudowires solve this problem on their own. IP and MPLS have client-side tools that would be used anyways. To Manuel's point about ".. terminal nodes connected by attachment circuits" - wouldn't those be handled by the existing pseudowire mechanisms? eric > Sent from my iPhone > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of Eric Osborne (eosborne) > > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 6:38 AM > > To: LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN); Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang > > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team; pwe3@ietf.org; > > mpls-tp@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollondraft-he- > > mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > > Of > > > LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN) > > > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:17 AM > > > To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang > > > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Sprecher,Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP > > > ad > > hoc > > > team; pwe3@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:[mpls-tp] > > pollondraft-he-mpls- > > > tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > > provocative statement alert- We should as we are talking about MPLS- > > TP > > and > > > not about IP network layer. > > > > > > > OK, so maybe this is where I'm confused. Aren't we talking about a > > mechanism to indicate to a *client* of TP that there's a problem > > (thus, Client Signal Fail)? > > > > > > > > eric > > > > > > > ./ > > > Lieven > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > > Of > > > Rajiv Asati (rajiva) > > > Sent: 02 December 2010 14:14 > > > To: Yuanlong Jiang > > > Cc: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP ad hoc team; > > > mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] > > pollondraft-he-mpls- > > > tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > > Are we ignoring the existence of BFD altogether? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Rajiv > > > > > > Sent from my Phone > > > > > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Yuanlong Jiang <yljiang@huawei.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > Typically, IP will only detect a failure in a time scale of > > minutes. > > > > That is one reason why MPLS-TP OAM and Protection & Switching is > > needed. > > > > I am not sure which mechanism in MPLS provides the CSF-like > > capability, > > > could you give more hints? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Yuanlong > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John E Drake" > > <jdrake@juniper.net> > > > > To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" > > > > <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>om>; "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>om>; > > "Loa > > > > Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>nu>; <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; > > > > <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:29 PM > > > > Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > > > > ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > > > > > > > >> Nurit, > > > >> > > > >> As I understand the original requirement from Malcolm Betts, this > > > capability is required for those cases in which a client is unable > > > to detect the failure of its peer. In MPLS-TP, we have three > > > clients, > > PW, > > > IP, and MPLS, and I am quite sure that IP and MPLS clients can take > > care > > > of themselves wrt detecting peer failure. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >> John > > > >> > > > >> Sent from my iPhone > > > >> > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) > > > >>> [mailto:nurit.sprecher@nsn.com] > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:47 AM > > > >>> To: John E Drake; Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; > > > >>> mpls- tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team > > > >>> Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > > > >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp- csf-03.txt > > > >>> > > > >>> But what about other client services... e.g. adapted by > > service-LSP > > > >>> and not by PWE3? > > > >>> > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On > > Behalf > > > >>> Of ext John E Drake > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:35 PM > > > >>> To: Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; > > mpls-tp@ietf.org; > > > >>> pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team > > > >>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > > > >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > >>> > > > >>> I am not convinced. It seems like it belongs in the Pseudo Wire > > > >>> application, which already has this capability. > > > >>> > > > >>> Sent from my iPhone > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > -----Original Message----- > > > >>> > From: Yuanlong Jiang [mailto:yljiang@huawei.com] > > > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:07 AM > > > >>> > To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; > > pwe3@ietf.org; > > > >>> > MPLS-TP ad hoc team > > > >>> > Subject: [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp- > > csf- > > > >>> 03.txt > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Support. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I believe this mechanism is needed in MPLS-TP. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks > > > >>> > Yuanlong > > > >>> > > > > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> > From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> > > > >>> > To: <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; > > "MPLS-TP > > > >>> > ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> > > > >>> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:56 PM > > > >>> > Subject: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > all, > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > this is to start a two week poll on making > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > a mpls working group document. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Please send comments support/not support to the mpls-tp > > maililng > > > >>> > list. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > The poll ends Thursday Dec 2, 2010. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > /Loa > > > >>> > > -- > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Loa Andersson email: > > > >>> > loa.andersson@ericsson.com > > > >>> > > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu > > > >>> > > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 > > > >>> > > +46 767 72 92 > > > >>> > > 13 _______________________________________________ > > > >>> > > mpls-tp mailing list > > > >>> > > mpls-tp@ietf.org > > > >>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp > > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> pwe3 mailing list > > > >>> pwe3@ietf.org > > > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > pwe3 mailing list > > > > pwe3@ietf.org > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls mailing list > > > mpls@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls mailing list > > > mpls@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-tp mailing list > > mpls-tp@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)