Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt

"Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <eosborne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951DE28C0CE; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:56:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUUIfo-lGgs2; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:56:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECB128C13E; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An8CAMdC90ytJXG+/2dsb2JhbACUUY5QcadMmw4ChUUEhF5VhEKECA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,288,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="188391901"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2010 14:58:10 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com [72.163.62.138]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB2EwAUR025571; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:58:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-202.cisco.com ([72.163.62.209]) by xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:57:50 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:57:48 -0600
Message-ID: <D29E470202D67745B61059870F433B5403A8A3BD@XMB-RCD-202.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C549DE0E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcuSIsOuufii+EmrRR6zdRegAAiNTAAAEK3wAALYf+AAAHu9IAAAIrJw
References: <D29E470202D67745B61059870F433B5403A8A38E@XMB-RCD-202.cisco.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C549DE0E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com>
To: "John E Drake" <jdrake@juniper.net>, "LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)" <lieven.levrau@alcatel-lucent.com>, "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>, "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2010 14:57:50.0106 (UTC) FILETIME=[49E617A0:01CB9231]
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, pwe3@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:56:57 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John E Drake [mailto:jdrake@juniper.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 9:53 AM
> To: Eric Osborne (eosborne); LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN); Rajiv Asati
> (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team; pwe3@ietf.org;
mpls-tp@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP]
Re:pollondraft-he-mpls-
> tp-csf-03.txt
> 
> As I understand it, the server at one end of an LSP detects that its
> client has failed and it uses CSF to tell the server at the other end
of
> the LSP.  Presumably that server then tells its client.
> 


Yup.  And I go back to my earlier point - there are three things we know
how to transport over MPLS: MPLS, IP, and pseudowires.  Pseudowires
solve this problem on their own.  IP and MPLS have client-side tools
that would be used anyways.

To Manuel's point about ".. terminal nodes connected by attachment
circuits" - wouldn't those be handled by the existing pseudowire
mechanisms?





eric


> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Eric Osborne (eosborne)
> > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 6:38 AM
> > To: LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN); Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang
> > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team; pwe3@ietf.org;
> > mpls-tp@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollondraft-he-
> > mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:17 AM
> > > To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang
> > > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Sprecher,Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP
> > > ad
> > hoc
> > > team; pwe3@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:[mpls-tp]
> > pollondraft-he-mpls-
> > > tp-csf-03.txt
> > >
> > > provocative statement alert- We should as we are talking about
MPLS-
> > TP
> > and
> > > not about IP network layer.
> > >
> >
> > OK, so maybe this is where I'm confused.  Aren't we talking about a
> > mechanism to indicate to a *client* of TP that there's a problem
> > (thus, Client Signal Fail)?
> >
> >
> >
> > eric
> >
> >
> > > ./
> > > Lieven
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
> > > Sent: 02 December 2010 14:14
> > > To: Yuanlong Jiang
> > > Cc: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP ad hoc team;
> > > mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp]
> > pollondraft-he-mpls-
> > > tp-csf-03.txt
> > >
> > > Are we ignoring the existence of BFD altogether?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Rajiv
> > >
> > > Sent from my Phone
> > >
> > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Yuanlong Jiang <yljiang@huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > Typically, IP will only detect a failure in a time scale of
> > minutes.
> > > > That is one reason why MPLS-TP OAM and Protection & Switching is
> > needed.
> > > > I am not sure which mechanism in MPLS provides the CSF-like
> > capability,
> > > could you give more hints?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Yuanlong
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John E Drake"
> > <jdrake@juniper.net>
> > > > To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)"
> > > > <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>om>; "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>om>;
> > "Loa
> > > > Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>nu>; <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>;
> > > > <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:29 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll
> > > > ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Nurit,
> > > >>
> > > >> As I understand the original requirement from Malcolm Betts,
this
> > > capability is required for those cases in which a client is unable
> > > to detect the failure of its peer.  In MPLS-TP, we have three
> > > clients,
> > PW,
> > > IP, and MPLS, and I am quite sure that IP and MPLS clients can
take
> > care
> > > of themselves wrt detecting peer failure.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> John
> > > >>
> > > >> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
> > > >>> [mailto:nurit.sprecher@nsn.com]
> > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:47 AM
> > > >>> To: John E Drake; Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson;
mpls@ietf.org;
> > > >>> mpls- tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team
> > > >>> Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll
> > > >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp- csf-03.txt
> > > >>>
> > > >>> But what about other client services... e.g. adapted by
> > service-LSP
> > > >>> and not by PWE3?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf
> > > >>> Of ext John E Drake
> > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:35 PM
> > > >>> To: Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org;
> > mpls-tp@ietf.org;
> > > >>> pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team
> > > >>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll
> > > >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I am not convinced.  It seems like it belongs in the Pseudo
Wire
> > > >>> application, which already has this capability.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> > From: Yuanlong Jiang [mailto:yljiang@huawei.com]
> > > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:07 AM
> > > >>> > To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org;
> > pwe3@ietf.org;
> > > >>> > MPLS-TP ad hoc team
> > > >>> > Subject: [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-
> > csf-
> > > >>> 03.txt
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Support.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I believe this mechanism is needed in MPLS-TP.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Thanks
> > > >>> > Yuanlong
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>> > From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>
> > > >>> > To: <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>;
> > "MPLS-TP
> > > >>> > ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>
> > > >>> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:56 PM
> > > >>> > Subject: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > all,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > this is to start a two week poll on making
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > a mpls working group document.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Please send comments support/not support to the mpls-tp
> > maililng
> > > >>> > list.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > The poll ends Thursday Dec 2, 2010.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > /Loa
> > > >>> > > --
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Loa Andersson                         email:
> > > >>> > loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> > > >>> > > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> > > >>> > > Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52
13
> > > >>> > >                                              +46 767 72 92
> > > >>> > > 13 _______________________________________________
> > > >>> > > mpls-tp mailing list
> > > >>> > > mpls-tp@ietf.org
> > > >>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
> > > >>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> pwe3 mailing list
> > > >>> pwe3@ietf.org
> > > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > pwe3 mailing list
> > > > pwe3@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mpls mailing list
> > > mpls@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mpls mailing list
> > > mpls@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls-tp mailing list
> > mpls-tp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp